Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38441207›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanical engineering2024

Integration of Febio as an Instructional Tool in the Undergraduate Biomechanics Curriculum.

David Jiang, David W Grainger, Jeffrey A Weiss, Lucas H Timmins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanical engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David JiangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; School of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77843; EnMed Tower, 1020 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030.
David W GraingerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Drive, SMBB 3100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; Department of Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Jeffrey A WeissASME Fellow Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, 36 S. Wasatch Drive, SMBB 3100, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112; Department of Orthopedics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
Lucas H TimminsSchool of Engineering Medicine, Texas A&M University, Houston, TX 77030; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; Department of Multidisciplinary Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112;EnMed Tower, 1020 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX 77030.

Funding

Finite Elements For Biomechanics And BiophysicsR01GM083925 · NIGMS · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GERARD A. ATESHIAN, JEFFREY A. WEISS · 2008 to 2026
$7.6M
Lab-to-User Training and Dissemination for the FEBio Software SuiteU24EB029007 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI WEISS, JEFFREY A. · 2019 to 2023
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB029007NIBIB NIH HHS U24-EB029007NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083925NIGMS NIH HHS R01-GM083925
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Computer simulations play an important role in a range of biomedical engineering applications. Thus, it is important that biomedical engineering students engage with modeling in their undergraduate education and establish an understanding of its practice. In addition, computational tools enhance active learning and complement standard pedagogical approaches to promote student understanding of course content. Herein, we describe the development and implementation of learning modules for computational modeling and simulation (CM&S) within an undergraduate biomechanics course. We developed four CM&S learning modules that targeted predefined course goals and learning outcomes within the febio studio software. For each module, students were guided through CM&S tutorials and tasked to construct and analyze more advanced models to assess learning and competency and evaluate module effectiveness. Results showed that students demonstrated an increased interest in CM&S through module progression and that modules promoted the understanding of course content. In addition, students exhibited increased understanding and competency in finite element model development and simulation software use. Lastly, it was evident that students recognized the importance of coupling theory, experiments, and modeling and understood the importance of CM&S in biomedical engineering and its broad application. Our findings suggest that integrating well-designed CM&S modules into undergraduate biomedical engineering education holds much promise in supporting student learning experiences and introducing students to modern engineering tools relevant to professional development.

Indexed as

CurriculumStudentsBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationHumansSoftwarecomputational simulationengineering educationFEBiofinite element analysispedagogy

Identifiers

PMID38441207
PMCPMC11005855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.