Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440792›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2024

MRI-guided radiotherapy in twenty fractions for localised prostate cancer; results from the MOMENTUM study.

Kobika Sritharan, Lois Daamen, Angela Pathmanathan, Tine Schytte, Floris Pos, Ananya Choudhury, Jochem R N van der Voort van Zyp, Linda G W Kerkmeijer, William Hall, Emma Hall and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. MR-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy in Localized Prostate Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatment
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kobika SritharanThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Lois DaamenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Angela PathmanathanThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Tine SchytteOdense University Hospital, Denmark.
Floris PosThe Netherlands Cancer Institute, The Netherlands.
Ananya ChoudhuryDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Jochem R N van der Voort van ZypDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Linda G W KerkmeijerRadboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
William HallMedical College of Wisconsin, USA.
Emma HallThe Institute of Cancer Research, UK.
Helena M VerkooijenDivision of Imaging and Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Trina HerbertThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Shaista HafeezThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Adam MitchellThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
Alison C TreeThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) offers multiple potential advantages over CT-guidance. This study examines the potential clinical benefits of MRIgRT for men with localised prostate cancer, in the setting of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy. We evaluate two-year toxicity outcomes, early biochemical response and patient-reported outcomes (PRO), using data obtained from a multicentre international registry study, for the first group of patients with prostate cancer who underwent treatment on a 1.5 T MR-Linac. Materials and methods: Patients who were enrolled within the MOMENTUM study and received radical treatment with 60 Gy in 20 fractions were identified. PSA levels and CTCAE version 5.0 toxicity data were measured at follow-up visits. Those patients who consented to PRO data collection also completed EQ-5D-5L, EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-PR25 questionnaires. Results: Between November 2018 and June 2022, 146 patients who had MRIgRT for localised prostate cancer on the 1.5 T MR-Linac were eligible for this study. Grade 2 and worse gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity was reported in 3 % of patients at three months whilst grade 2 and worse genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 7 % at three months. There was a significant decrease in the median PSA at 12 months. The results from both the EQ-5D-5L data and EORTC global health status scale indicate a decline in the quality of life (QoL) during the first six months. The mean change in score for the EORTC scale showed a decrease of 11.4 points, which is considered clinically important. QoL improved back to baseline by 24 months. Worsening of hormonal symptoms in the first six months was reported with a return to baseline by 24 months and sexual activity in all men worsened in the first three months and returned to baseline at 12 months. Conclusion: This study establishes the feasibility of online-MRIgRT for localised prostate on a 1.5 T MR-Linac with low rates of toxicity, similar to that published in the literature. However, the clinical benefits of MRIgRT over conventional radiotherapy in the setting of moderate hypofractionation is not evident. Further research will focus on the delivery of ultrahypofractionated regimens, where the potential advantages of MRIgRT for prostate cancer may become more discernible.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyMOMENTUMMRIgRTMR-LinacPatient-reported outcomesProstate cancer

Identifiers

PMID38440792
PMCPMC10909700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.