Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440588›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024

Assessment of Preoperative Predictors for Difficult Laryngeal Exposure in Endolaryngeal Surgery.

Saurabh Nautiyal, Vinish Kumar Agarwal, S S Bist, Lovneesh Kumar, Mahima Luthra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Prediction of difficult laryngeal exposure in microlaryngoscopy: a scoping review.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saurabh NautiyalDepartment of ENT, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jollygrant, 248016 Dehradun, Uttarakhand India.
Vinish Kumar AgarwalDepartment of ENT, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jollygrant, 248016 Dehradun, Uttarakhand India.ORCID 0000-0002-9840-9845
S S BistDepartment of ENT, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jollygrant, 248016 Dehradun, Uttarakhand India.
Lovneesh KumarDepartment of ENT, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jollygrant, 248016 Dehradun, Uttarakhand India.
Mahima LuthraDepartment of ENT, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Jollygrant, 248016 Dehradun, Uttarakhand India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The proper visualisation of the larynx is required for the diagnostic assessment and therapeutic intervention. The most significant challenges for surgeon is to visualise the anterior commissure of the glottis region. The aim of this study is to record the preoperative laryngoscore in patients posted for endolaryngeal surgery and to assess preoperative predictors for intraoperative difficult laryngeal exposure by correlating with preoperative laryngoscore. Design: Prospective, Cross-sectional, Observational study. Setting: Department of Otorhinolaryngology in a tertiary care teaching facility. Subjects: 150 patients were included with an endolaryngeal disease who were planned for surgery with age > 18yrs. Methodology: In 150 subjects preoperative laryngoscore was calculated, which comprised 11 parameters including thyromental distance, mandibular prognathism, macroglossia, micrognathia, trismus, inter incisor gap, degree of neck flexion-extension, history of prior open-neck surgery or radiotherapy, upper jaw dental status, modified Mallampati score and body mass index in order to produce a total score out of a possible maximum score of 17. According to the anterior commissure visualisation all patients were categorised into five classes, ranging from class 0 to class IV during surgery. The laryngoscore parameters were assessed and compared statistically with five classes of intraoperative anterior commissure visualisation. Result: Out of 150 patients 70 (46.6%) were having 3-4 laryngoscore, followed by 45 (30%) patients with 5-6 laryngoscore. Total 123 (82%) patient had class 0,1 and 2 intraoperative anterior commissure visualisation while 27 (18%) had class 3 and 4 visualisation. If laryngoscore was either less or equal to 5, 90% of the patients had excellent laryngeal exposure whereas only 10% of the patients had challenging laryngeal exposure. At univariate analysis, thyromental distance, degree of neck flexion/extension, and modified Mallampati classification were found statistically significant for difficulty of anterior commissure visualisation independently. Conclusion: A sound, easy and valid preoperative laryngoscore may be significantly helpful in identifying intraoperative difficult laryngeal exposure. This may prevent inadequacy of surgery, abandon of surgery, intra operative complication, and medico-legal cases for laryngologist.

Indexed as

Anterior commissureDifficult laryngeal exposureGood laryngeal exposureLaryngoscore

Identifiers

PMID38440588
PMCPMC10908999

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.