Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440417›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2024

Bioelectronic Medicine: a multidisciplinary roadmap from biophysics to precision therapies.

María Alejandra González-González, Silvia V Conde, Ramon Latorre, Stéphanie C Thébault, Marta Pratelli, Nicholas C Spitzer, Alexei Verkhratsky, Marie-Ève Tremblay, Cuneyt G Akcora, Ana G Hernández-Reynoso and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

María Alejandra González-GonzálezJan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
Silvia V CondeiNOVA4Health, NOVA Medical School, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, NOVA University, Lisbon, Portugal.
Ramon LatorreCentro Interdisciplinario de Neurociencia de Valparaíso, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.
Stéphanie C ThébaultLaboratorio de Investigación Traslacional en salud visual (D-13), Instituto de Neurobiología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Querétaro, Mexico.
Marta PratelliNeurobiology Department, Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Nicholas C SpitzerNeurobiology Department, Kavli Institute for Brain and Mind, UC San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Alexei VerkhratskyFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Marie-Ève TremblayDivision of Medical Sciences, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada.
Cuneyt G AkcoraDepartment of Computer Science, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Ana G Hernández-ReynosoDepartment of Bioengineering, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, United States.
Melanie EckerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Texas, Denton, TX, United States.
Jayme CoatesThe Luxi Group, New Hartford, CT, United States.
Kathleen L VincentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States.
Brandy MaStanley H. Appel Department of Neurology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, United States.
University of California San Diego · USChina Medical University · CNHartford Financial Services (United States)Methodist Hospital · USNeurological Research Institute · USThe University of Texas at Dallas · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PTUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México · MXUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Central Florida · USUniversity of North Texas · USUniversity of Valparaíso · CL

Funding

The Electrophysiological Studies of Voltage Gated ChannelsR01GM030376 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI BEZANILLA, FRANCISCO J · 1985 to 2025
$9.1M
Targeted Neuroplasticity via vagus nerve stimulation to improve urinary dysfunction after spinal cord injuryK99NS135194 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS DALLAS · PI HERNANDEZ-REYNOSO, ANA · 2023 to 2023
$109k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM030376NINDS NIH HHS K99 NS135194
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioelectronic Medicine stands as an emerging field that rapidly evolves and offers distinctive clinical benefits, alongside unique challenges. It consists of the modulation of the nervous system by precise delivery of electrical current for the treatment of clinical conditions, such as post-stroke movement recovery or drug-resistant disorders. The unquestionable clinical impact of Bioelectronic Medicine is underscored by the successful translation to humans in the last decades, and the long list of preclinical studies. Given the emergency of accelerating the progress in new neuromodulation treatments (i.e., drug-resistant hypertension, autoimmune and degenerative diseases), collaboration between multiple fields is imperative. This work intends to foster multidisciplinary work and bring together different fields to provide the fundamental basis underlying Bioelectronic Medicine. In this review we will go from the biophysics of the cell membrane, which we consider the inner core of neuromodulation, to patient care. We will discuss the recently discovered mechanism of neurotransmission switching and how it will impact neuromodulation design, and we will provide an update on neuronal and glial basis in health and disease. The advances in biomedical technology have facilitated the collection of large amounts of data, thereby introducing new challenges in data analysis. We will discuss the current approaches and challenges in high throughput data analysis, encompassing big data, networks, artificial intelligence, and internet of things. Emphasis will be placed on understanding the electrochemical properties of neural interfaces, along with the integration of biocompatible and reliable materials and compliance with biomedical regulations for translational applications. Preclinical validation is foundational to the translational process, and we will discuss the critical aspects of such animal studies. Finally, we will focus on the patient point-of-care and challenges in neuromodulation as the ultimate goal of bioelectronic medicine. This review is a call to scientists from different fields to work together with a common endeavor: accelerate the decoding and modulation of the nervous system in a new era of therapeutic possibilities.

Indexed as

biocompatible materialsbioelectronic medicinechannel biophysicsgliahigh throughput datamedical devicesneuromodulationneuronal plasticity

Identifiers

PMID38440417
PMCPMC10911101
OpenAlexW4391926263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.