Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440382›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in radiology2024

Deep-learning for automated detection of MSU deposits on DECT: evaluating impact on efficiency and reader confidence.

Shahriar Faghani, Soham Patel, Nicholas G Rhodes, Garret M Powell, Francis I Baffour, Mana Moassefi, Katrina N Glazebrook, Bradley J Erickson, Christin A Tiegs-Heiden

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shahriar FaghaniArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Soham PatelDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Nicholas G RhodesDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Garret M PowellDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Francis I BaffourDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Mana MoassefiArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Katrina N GlazebrookDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Bradley J EricksonArtificial Intelligence Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.
Christin A Tiegs-HeidenDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Dual-energy CT (DECT) is a non-invasive way to determine the presence of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in the workup of gout. Color-coding distinguishes MSU from calcium following material decomposition and post-processing. Manually identifying these foci (most commonly labeled green) is tedious, and an automated detection system could streamline the process. This study aims to evaluate the impact of a deep-learning (DL) algorithm developed for detecting green pixelations on DECT on reader time, accuracy, and confidence. Methods: We collected a sample of positive and negative DECTs, reviewed twice-once with and once without the DL tool-with a 2-week washout period. An attending musculoskeletal radiologist and a fellow separately reviewed the cases, simulating clinical workflow. Metrics such as time taken, confidence in diagnosis, and the tool's helpfulness were recorded and statistically analyzed. Results: We included thirty DECTs from different patients. The DL tool significantly reduced the reading time for the trainee radiologist ( Conclusions: The implementation of the developed DL model slightly reduced reading time for our less experienced reader and led to improved diagnostic accuracy. There was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic confidence when studies were interpreted without and with the DL model.

Indexed as

deep learningdual-energy CTgoutsegmentationtime-efficiency study

Identifiers

PMID38440382
PMCPMC10909828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.