Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440285›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2024

Patients' and Relatives' Preferences for Outpatient and Day Care Services Within End-of-Life Care in Germany - A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Beate Apolinarski, Lea de Jong, Franziska A Herbst, Carolin Huperz, Hanna A A Röwer, Nils Schneider, Kathrin Damm, Stephanie Stiel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beate Apolinarski *Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9320-6216
Lea de Jong *Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Franziska A HerbstInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2602-9277
Carolin HuperzInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6761-087X
Hanna A A RöwerInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0009-0006-9680-7969
Nils SchneiderInstitute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Kathrin Damm *Center for Health Economics Research Hannover (CHERH), Leibniz University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3983-1149
Stephanie Stiel *Institute for General Practice and Palliative Care, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5963-2526

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In Germany, patients with incurable chronic diseases living at home increasingly have the option of using outpatient and day care hospice and specialized palliative care services. The present study examined and compared patients' and their relatives' preferences for end-of-life outpatient and day care services. Patients and Methods: The study used a questionnaire integrating a discrete choice experiment. For six scenarios, participants chose between two hypothetical end-of-life care offers, described by seven attributes. The model compared place of care, frequency and duration of care and support, specialized medical palliative care, accompanied activities, and relieving patient counselling. The model also included optional overnight care and willingness to pay. Patients and the relatives of patients suffering from incurable, chronic diseases who were not yet receiving palliative care were recruited via hospitals and self-help groups (06/2021-07/2022). Results: The results were based on data from 436 questionnaires (patients: n=263, relatives: n=173). All attributes had a statistically significant impact on choice decisions, with place of care showing the greatest importance. All respondents highly preferred care in the patient's home over out-of-home care. Patients stressed the importance of special medical (palliative) care and valued accompanied activities, often facilitated by hospice volunteers. Relatives, but not patients, considered the frequency and duration of care highly relevant. Conclusion: The results suggest a higher demand for care in the patient's home than for out-of-home care. Patients' and relatives' high preference for special medical care and the relief of family caregiver burden should be considered in the design of day care services.

Indexed as

ambulatory carediscrete choice experimenthospice caremedical day carepalliative carepreferences

Identifiers

PMID38440285
PMCPMC10910970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.