Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Conceptualizing care partners' burden, stress, and support for reintegrating Veterans: a mixed methods study.

Nicholas A Rattray, Mindy Flanagan, Allison Mann, Leah Danson, Ai-Nghia Do, Diana Natividad, Katrina Spontak, Gala True

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Rural Patients' Transitional Care Experiences: A Qualitative Analysis of Provider Notes.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas A RattrayVA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Mindy FlanaganVA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Allison MannVA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Leah DansonVA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Ai-Nghia DoVA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Diana NatividadVA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Katrina SpontakVA Health Services Research and Development Center for Health Information and Communication, Roudebush Veteran Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, United States.
Gala TrueSouth Central Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Southeast Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, New Orleans, LA, United States.
University of Indianapolis · USHealth Services Research & Development · USRichard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center · USLouisiana State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People who support Veterans as they transition from their military service into civilian life may be at an increased risk of psychological distress. Existing studies focus primarily on paid family caregivers, but few studies include spouses and informal non-family "care partners." We sought to identify key challenges faced by care partners of Veterans with invisible injuries. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 36 individuals involved in supporting a recently separated US military Veteran enrolled in a 2-year longitudinal study. CPs completed validated measures on perceived stress, caregiving burden, quality of their relationship, life satisfaction, and flourishing. Independent Results: Care partners reported shifts in self-perception that occurred from supporting a Veteran, emphasizing how they helped Veterans navigate health systems and the processes of disclosing health and personal information in civilian contexts. Exemplar cases with high and low burdens demonstrated divergent experiences in self-perception, managing multi-faceted strain, and coping with stress over time. Case studies of specific care partners illustrate how multi-faceted strain shifted over time and is affected by additional burdens from childcare, financial responsibilities, or lack of education on mental health issues. Conclusions: Findings suggest the unique needs of individuals who support military Veterans with invisible injuries, highlighting variations and diachronic elements of caregiving. This sample is younger than the typical caregiver sample with implications for how best to support unpaid care partners caring for Veterans in the early to mid-period of their use of VA and civilian health services.

Indexed as

Military PersonnelVeteransCaregiversCoping SkillsHumansLongitudinal Studiescaregiver burdencaregivinghealth servicesmilitary Veteransmixed methodsveteran reintegration

Identifiers

PMID38440161
PMCPMC10910616
OpenAlexW4391926988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.