Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440123›Full record

ReviewAnimal cells and systems2024

Factors affecting the cleavage efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system.

Won Jun Jung, Soo-Ji Park, Seongkwang Cha, Kyoungmi Kim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cells and systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Establishment of CRISPR/Cas9 Genome Editing inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. CRISPR Gene Tagging for Illuminating Endogenous Protein Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Won Jun JungDepartment of Physiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5162-3164
Soo-Ji ParkDepartment of Physiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-0417-7487
Seongkwang ChaDepartment of Physiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-2368
Kyoungmi KimDepartment of Physiology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0941-806X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The CRISPR-Cas system stands out as a promising genome editing tool due to its cost-effectiveness and time efficiency compared to other methods. This system has tremendous potential for treating various diseases, including genetic disorders and cancer, and promotes therapeutic research for a wide range of genetic diseases. Additionally, the CRISPR-Cas system simplifies the generation of animal models, offering a more accessible alternative to traditional methods. The CRISPR-Cas9 system can be used to cleave target DNA strands that need to be corrected, causing double-strand breaks (DSBs). DNA with DSBs can then be recovered by the DNA repair pathway that the CRISPR-Cas9 system uses to edit target gene sequences. High cleavage efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system is thus imperative for effective gene editing. Herein, we explore several factors affecting the cleavage efficiency of the CRISPR-Cas9 system. These factors include the GC content of the protospacer-adjacent motif (PAM) proximal and distal regions, single-guide RNA (sgRNA) properties, and chromatin state. These considerations contribute to the efficiency of genome editing.

Indexed as

chromatin statecleavage efficiencyCRISPR-Cas9 systemgenome editingsgRNA

Identifiers

PMID38440123
PMCPMC10911232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.