Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440121›Full record

ArticleAnalytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam)2024

Intraoperative Touch Imprint Cytology of Brain Neoplasms: A Useful High-Diagnostic Tool in 93 Consecutive Cases; Differential Diagnoses, Pitfalls, and Traps.

Ali Koyuncuer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Advancements in Neurosurgical Intraoperative Histology.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ali KoyuncuerDepartment of Pathology, Umraniye Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences, Istanbul, Türkiye.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0994-1275
Ümraniye Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Intraoperative cytological examination of central nervous system (CNS) lesions was first introduced in 1920 by Eisenhardt and Cushing for rapid evaluation of neurosurgical specimens and to guide surgical treatment. It is recognized that this method not only confirms the adequacy of biopsy in CNS samples but also indicates the presence and preliminary diagnosis of lesional tissue. Methods: A total of 93 patients who underwent touch imprint cytology (TIC) for CNS tumors or lesions between 2018 and 2023 were included in the study. All cases were correlated with the final histopathological diagnosis, and pitfalls and difficulties encountered with discrepancies were noted. Result: The most common primary CNS tumors were gliomas and meningiomas, while secondary (metastatic) tumors were predominantly lung, breast, and gastrointestinal system carcinomas. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for diagnosis with TIC were 94.1%, 100%, and 61.5%, respectively. Final histopathological diagnosis by TIC was made in 88 cases (94.6%) and the discrepancy was found in 5 cases (5.37%). Three of the five discrepancies (3.2%) were haematolymphoid malignancies (two lymphomas and one plasma cell neoplasia), one glioblastoma, and one hemangioblastoma case. Conclusion: TIC is a fast, safe, and inexpensive diagnostic tool used during intraoperative neuropathology consultation. Awareness of the pitfalls of using this method during intraoperative consultation will enable high-diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGliomaCytodiagnosisDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansTouch

Identifiers

PMID38440121
PMCPMC10911881
OpenAlexW4390599520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.