ArticleAnalytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam)2024
Intraoperative Touch Imprint Cytology of Brain Neoplasms: A Useful High-Diagnostic Tool in 93 Consecutive Cases; Differential Diagnoses, Pitfalls, and Traps.
Article in Analytical cellular pathology (Amsterdam), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative assessment of the associations between MTR and MTRR gene polymorphisms and glioma risk.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Optimizing Endoscopic Respiratory Diagnostics with Cytology: An Update on Touch Imprints with a Comparative Literature Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Advancements in Neurosurgical Intraoperative Histology.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intraoperative cytological examination of central nervous system (CNS) lesions was first introduced in 1920 by Eisenhardt and Cushing for rapid evaluation of neurosurgical specimens and to guide surgical treatment. It is recognized that this method not only confirms the adequacy of biopsy in CNS samples but also indicates the presence and preliminary diagnosis of lesional tissue. Methods: A total of 93 patients who underwent touch imprint cytology (TIC) for CNS tumors or lesions between 2018 and 2023 were included in the study. All cases were correlated with the final histopathological diagnosis, and pitfalls and difficulties encountered with discrepancies were noted. Result: The most common primary CNS tumors were gliomas and meningiomas, while secondary (metastatic) tumors were predominantly lung, breast, and gastrointestinal system carcinomas. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for diagnosis with TIC were 94.1%, 100%, and 61.5%, respectively. Final histopathological diagnosis by TIC was made in 88 cases (94.6%) and the discrepancy was found in 5 cases (5.37%). Three of the five discrepancies (3.2%) were haematolymphoid malignancies (two lymphomas and one plasma cell neoplasia), one glioblastoma, and one hemangioblastoma case. Conclusion: TIC is a fast, safe, and inexpensive diagnostic tool used during intraoperative neuropathology consultation. Awareness of the pitfalls of using this method during intraoperative consultation will enable high-diagnostic accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.