Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38440078›Full record

ArticleJournal of healthcare leadership2024

Implementing Clinical Guidelines for the Treatment of Psychosis: The Frontline Leaders' Point of View. A Qualitative Study.

Håkan M A Nordin, Gro Ellen Mathisen, Kristine Rørtveit, Inge Joa, Jan O Johannessen, Torleif Ruud, Miriam Hartveit

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of healthcare leadership, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03271242 (A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03271242 completednot on this map

A Pairwise Randomized Study on Implementation of Guidelines and Evidence Based Treatments of Psychoses

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, AkershusRan2016 to 2018Enrolled325ConditionsPsychotic DisordersArmsSystematic implementation support, No implementation support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Håkan M A NordinDepartment of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-9609-7844
Gro Ellen MathisenNorwegian School of Hotel Management, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
Kristine RørtveitDepartment of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6657-1012
Inge JoaDepartment of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5516-2336
Jan O JohannessenDepartment of Psychiatry, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Torleif RuudDivision of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-4821-1267
Miriam HartveitDepartment for Research and Innovation, Helse Fonna Health Trust, Valen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7143-2236

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite the large amount of leadership and implementation theories and recommendations, healthcare services continue to struggle with efficiently incorporating new knowledge. The questioning of conventional leadership approaches in healthcare organizations prompted us to investigate how frontline leaders comprehend their own implementation intentions and actions, and how these intentions and actions may impact the implementation of clinical guidelines in mental healthcare in Norway. Methods: Employing a theory-driven qualitative design, we conducted nine semi-structured interviews with frontline leaders who had recently led implementation of clinical guidelines for the treatment of psychosis in mental health. We employed Systematic Text Condensation, informed by Normalization Process Theory, to structure and analyze the data and used fidelity scales to measure the degree of implementation and distinguish between leaders' levels of success in implementation. Results: Frontline leaders in units that achieved high success in implementation described their intentions and actions differently, from those with less success. The former group's actions aligned more closely with the constructs of the Normalization Process Theory compared to the latter group when describing their actions. Frontline leaders leading units with a high degree of implementation success describe relation-orientation, trust, and providing adaptive space for staff members to take initiative. In contrast, those leading units with less implementation success describe more control and guidance of co-operators and place more emphasize on information and knowledge. Conclusion: Differences in how frontline leaders describe their actions and intentions to achieve clinical guideline implementation suggest that the leadership approach of these frontline leaders is an important factor to consider when planning and conducting implementation. To better understand the implementation process, it is important to pay attention to how frontline leaders customize their leadership approaches to the dynamics of complex organizations, and how they interact with their team and superiors.

Indexed as

complexity leadership theoryfrontline leaders’ implementation of clinical guidelinesimplementation fidelitynormalization process theory

Identifiers

PMID38440078
PMCPMC10910968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.