ArticleFood chemistry: X2024
PeposX-Exhaust: A lightweight and efficient tool for identification of short peptides.
Article in Food chemistry: X, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the patterns and mechanisms of time-specific release of multifunctional peptides from cricket protein.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Short peptides have become the focus of recent research due to their variable bioactivities, good digestibility and wide existences in food-derived protein hydrolysates. However, due to the high complexity of the samples, identifying short peptides still remains a challenge. In this work, a tool, named PeposX-Exhaust, was developed for short peptide identification. Through validation with known peptides, PeposX-Exhaust identified all the submitted spectra and the accuracy rate reached 75.36%, and the adjusted accuracy rate further reached 98.55% when with top 5 candidates considered. Compared with other tools, the accuracy rate by PeposX-Exhaust was at least 70% higher than two database-search tools and 15% higher than the other two de novo-sequencing tools, respectively. For further application, the numbers of short peptides identified from soybean, walnut, collagen and bonito protein hydrolysates reached 1145, 628, 746 and 681, respectively. This fully demonstrated the superiority of the tool in short peptide identification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.