ArticleCureus2024
Technical Quality and Diagnostic Impact of Chest X-rays in Tuberculosis Screening: Insights From a Saudi Teleradiology Cohort.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Radiological Findings of Chest X-Rays During the Hajj Seasons 1444-1445 H/2023-2024 G: Diagnostic Quality and Gender Differences in Interpretation Concordance.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Post-deployment performance of a deep learning algorithm for normal and abnormal chest X-ray classification: A study at visa screening centers in the United Arab Emirates.European journal of radiology open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives To assess the standard of chest X-ray techniques in tuberculosis (TB) screening within Saudi Arabian healthcare facilities and evaluate the impact of technical quality on radiological interpretation. Materials and methods Analysis of 250 posteroanterior chest radiographs sourced from a network of five clinics was conducted. These images were scrutinized for technical quality by a radiologist. Results Of the radiographs analyzed, 57% exhibited technical issues, with overexposure and clothing artifacts being the most commonly encountered. Notably, only 14% of these radiographs were deemed to have compromised diagnostic ability. Conclusion The presence of technical issues in most chest X-rays for TB screening highlights a significant area for improvement. However, the relatively low percentage of radiographs impacting diagnostic quality indicates that most issues do not critically hinder the radiologist's interpretative capability. This underscores the importance of balanced quality control measures in radiographic practices for effective TB detection in the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.