ReviewCureus2024
Regeneration of the Retina Using Pluripotent Stem Cells: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the outcomes of pluripotent stem-cell-derived photoreceptor transplantation in retinal repair.The FEBS journal · 2025Review
- Ibuprofen reduces inflammation, necroptosis and protects photoreceptors from light-induced retinal degeneration.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2025Article
- Review
- Gene Therapy for Retinitis Pigmentosa: Current Challenges and New Progress.Biomolecules · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Retinitis pigmentosa and age-related macular degeneration are the most frequent causes of irreversible visual impairment in the world. Existing therapeutic methods could be more effective, underscoring the necessity of new treatments. Reconstructing the retinal photoreceptors through the transplantation of human pluripotent stem cells, representing an attractive approach for restoring vision, has gained momentum. This paper gives an exhaustive account of what has been known in this field, the discoveries made, and the recent progress. This review paper outlines the retina's organisation, cell types, the pathophysiology of retinal injury/degeneration, and the reasoning behind using pluripotent stem cells in retinal regeneration. This article investigates differentiation strategies, molecular components that dictate cell type specification, and the recreation of retinal development in vitro, genetically engineering and manipulating epigenetic marks using various techniques for driving specific cell fates and improving therapy efficacy. Subretinal injection methods, cell encapsulation techniques, scaffold-based approaches, cell sheet transplantation, and their impact on integrating implanted cells into a functional retina are thoroughly reviewed. Using bioengineering approaches, biomaterials and growth factors form a favourable micro-ambience for grafted cells. Issues around safety and efficacy (tumorigenicity, immunological rejection, and long-term integration/functionality) are explored. Moreover, the paper emphasises the significance of rigorous characterisation, immunomodulatory strategies, and clinical and pre-clinical studies to ensure the safety and effectiveness of retinal regeneration therapy. Future perspectives and challenges are presented, looking at fine-tuning differentiation strategies, improving functional integration and regulatory aspects, and using co-therapy and supportive treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.