Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439941›Full record

ArticleGlobal biogeochemical cycles2023

The Role of Wildfires in the Interplay of Forest Carbon Stocks and Wood Harvest in the Contiguous United States During the 20th Century.

Andreas Magerl, Simone Gingrich, Sarah Matej, Geoff Cunfer, Matthew Forrest, Christian Lauk, Stefan Schlaffer, Florian Weidinger, Cody Yuskiw, Karl-Heinz Erb

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global biogeochemical cycles, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas MagerlInstitute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5861-2195
Simone GingrichInstitute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7891-8688
Sarah MatejInstitute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4576-4189
Geoff CunferDepartment of History University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon SK Canada.
Matthew ForrestSenckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung Frankfurt am Main Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1858-3489
Christian LaukInstitute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria.
Stefan SchlafferVienna University of Technology Vienna Austria.
Florian WeidingerInstitute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7577-2054
Cody YuskiwCollege of Law University of Saskatchewan Saskatoon SK Canada.
Karl-Heinz ErbInstitute of Social Ecology University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Vienna Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8335-4159
BOKU University · ATUniversity of Saskatchewan · CASenckenberg - Leibniz Institution for Biodiversity and Earth System Research · DETU Wien · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfires and land use play a central role in the long-term carbon (C) dynamics of forested ecosystems of the United States. Understanding their linkages with changes in biomass, resource use, and consumption in the context of climate change mitigation is crucial. We reconstruct a long-term C balance of forests in the contiguous U.S. using historical reports, satellite data, and other sources at multiple scales (national scale 1926-2017, regional level 1941-2017) to disentangle the drivers of biomass C stock change. The balance includes removals of forest biomass by fire, by extraction of woody biomass, by forest grazing, and by biomass stock change, their sum representing the net ecosystem productivity (NEP). Nationally, the total forest NEP increased for most of the 20th century, while fire, harvest and grazing reduced total forest stocks on average by 14%, 51%, and 6%, respectively, resulting in a net increase in C stock density of nearly 40%. Recovery from past land-use, plus reductions in wildfires and forest grazing coincide with consistent forest regrowth in the eastern U.S. but associated C stock increases were offset by increased wood harvest. C stock changes across the western U.S. fluctuated, with fire, harvest, and other disturbances (e.g., insects, droughts) reducing stocks on average by 14%, 81%, and 7%, respectively, resulting in a net growth in C stock density of 14%. Although wildfire activities increased in recent decades, harvest was the key driver in the forest C balance in all regions for most of the observed timeframe.

Indexed as

biomass usecarbon dynamicsfire suppressionforest firesUnited Stateswildfires

Identifiers

PMID38439941
PMCPMC10909529
OpenAlexW4385667909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.