Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439857›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

Artificial intelligence algorithms for predicting post-operative ileus after laparoscopic surgery.

Cheng-Mao Zhou, HuiJuan Li, Qiong Xue, Jian-Jun Yang, Yu Zhu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Reshaping Anesthesia with Artificial Intelligence: From Concept to Reality.Anesthesia and critical care (Houston, Tex.) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cheng-Mao ZhouBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Department of Anaesthesiology and Nursing, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
HuiJuan LiBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Qiong XueBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Jian-Jun YangBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Yu ZhuBig Data and Artificial Intelligence Research Group, Department of Anaesthesiology and Nursing, Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNCentral People's Hospital of Zhanjiang · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: By constructing a predictive model using machine learning and deep learning technologies, we aim to understand the risk factors for postoperative intestinal obstruction in laparoscopic colorectal cancer patients, and establish an effective artificial intelligence-based predictive model to guide individualized prevention and treatment, thus improving patient outcomes. Methods: We constructed a model of the artificial intelligence algorithm in Python. Subjects were randomly assigned to either a training set for variable identification and model construction, or a test set for testing model performance, at a ratio of 7:3. The model was trained with ten algorithms. We used the AUC values of the ROC curves, as well as accuracy, precision, recall rate and F1 scores. Results: The results of feature engineering composited with the GBDT algorithm showed that opioid use, anesthesia duration, and body weight were the top three factors in the development of POI. We used ten machine learning and deep learning algorithms to validate the model, and the results were as follows: the three algorithms with best accuracy were XGB (0.807), Decision Tree (0.807) and Neural DecisionTree (0.807); the two algorithms with best precision were XGB (0.500) and Decision Tree (0.500); the two algorithms with best recall rate were adab (0.243) and Decision Tree (0.135); the two algorithms with highest F1 score were adab (0.290) and Decision Tree (0.213); and the three algorithms with best AUC were Gradient Boosting (0.678), XGB (0.638) and LinearSVC (0.633). Conclusion: This study shows that XGB and Decision Tree are the two best algorithms for predicting the risk of developing ileus after laparoscopic colon cancer surgery. It provides new insight and approaches to the field of postoperative intestinal obstruction in colorectal cancer through the application of machine learning techniques, thereby improving our understanding of the disease and offering strong support for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

AUCDeep learningMachine learningOpioidsPOIPredictionXGB

Identifiers

PMID38439857
PMCPMC10909660
OpenAlexW4392055393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.