ArticleEcancermedicalscience2024
Real world study of safety and efficacy of lorlatinib as second line and beyond in
Article in Ecancermedicalscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lorlatinib in patients withFuture oncology (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Lorlatinib atypical safety profile in ALK-positive aNSCLC: tips for management from an Italian expert panel.Future oncology (London, England) · 2026Review
- Lorlatinib in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC after prior progression on ALK inhibitors: real-world experience in Russia.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026Article
- Weight, BSA, Toxicity, and Efficacy of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors forJTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Lorlatinib, an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-inhibitor, is approved as frontline as well as subsequent line of therapy in ALK-rearranged advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). There is limited literature about safety and efficacy of lorlatinib in Indian patients. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective multicentre study on patients with ALK-rearranged advanced NSCLC received lorlatinib as second line and beyond between May 2017 and December 2021. ALK was tested either by immunohistochemistry or fluorescent in-situ hybridisation. Clinicopathologic features, treatment details, toxicity and outcomes were analysed. Results: A total of 38 patients were enrolled with a median age of 54 years (range: 30-72) and male: female ratio of 20:18. Fifteen (44%) patients had brain metastases at baseline. Lorlatinib use was - second line in 11 (29%), third line in 21 (55%) and fourth line in 4 (11%) of patients, respectively. The best radiologic response to lorlatinib was - complete response in 9 (24%), partial response in 17 (46%), stable disease in 9 (24%) and progressive disease in 2 (5%) of patients, respectively. After a median follow-up of 76.6 months (95% CI: 68.9-100), the median progression-free survival (PFS) of lorlatinib was not reached (95% CI: 24.3-not reached) and median overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort was 93.1 months (95% CI: 62-not reached). Both median PFS ( Conclusion: Lorlatinib was highly efficacious in terms of overall response rate, median PFS and median OS in this small real-world cohort of advanced
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.