Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439762›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in public health2024

Interventions to promote health literacy among working-age populations experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage: systematic review.

Himal Singh, Florence Samkange-Zeeb, Jonathan Kolschen, Ruben Herrmann, Wiebke Hübner, Núria Pedrós Barnils, Tilman Brand, Hajo Zeeb, Benjamin Schüz

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Health Literacy Gaps Across Language Groups: A Population-Based Assessment in Alto Adige/South Tyrol, Italy.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Himal SinghInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Florence Samkange-ZeebDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Jonathan KolschenInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Ruben HerrmannInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Wiebke HübnerDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Núria Pedrós BarnilsInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Tilman BrandDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Hajo ZeebDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.
Benjamin SchüzInstitute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
University of Bremen · DELeibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Experiencing financial insecurity and being underserved is often associated with low health literacy, i.e., the ability to identify, obtain, interpret and act upon health information, which may result in poor health outcomes. Little is known about effective interventions for promoting health literacy among underserved populations. The objective of this systematic review is to summarize the literature on such interventions and identify characteristics that differentiate more effective interventions. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines we searched the databases SCOPUS, Pubmed, Web of Science core collection and CINAHL. We included primary studies with a quantitative study design and control groups testing interventions to increase health literacy or health knowledge in underserved populations between 18 and 65 years. Where possible, we converted effect sizes into Cohen's d and compared mean differences of intervention and control groups. Albatross plots were created to summarize the results according to different health literacy and health knowledge outcomes. Results: We screened 3,696 titles and abstracts and 206 full texts. In total, 86 articles were analyzed, of which 55 were summarized in seven albatross plots. The majority of the studies ( Discussion: Although the outcomes addressed in the included studies were heterogeneous, effective intervention approaches were often culturally sensitive and developed tailored educational materials. Interventions aiming to promote health literacy in underserved populations should hence consider applying similar approaches.

Indexed as

Health LiteracySocioeconomic Disparities in HealthExerciseHealth PromotionHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicalbatross plotsface-to-facehealth literacyintervention strategiesmultilingual educationsocioeconomically disadvantagedsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID38439762
PMCPMC10909862
OpenAlexW4391928860

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.