Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439757›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2024

Validation of French versions of the 15-item picker patient experience questionnaire for adults, teenagers, and children inpatients.

Clement P Buclin, Adriana Uribe, Justine E Daverio, Arnaud Iseli, Johan N Siebert, Guy Haller, Stéphane Cullati, Delphine S Courvoisier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06326268 (Validation of the Improvement in the Management of Chemo-induced Mucositis in Hematology Through the Contribution of Photobiomodulation - The PHOTO-TREAT Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06326268 naunknown statusnot on this map

Validation of the Improvement in the Management of Chemo-induced Mucositis in Hematology Through the Contribution of Photobiomodulation - The PHOTO-TREAT Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstitut de cancérologie Strasbourg EuropeRan2024 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsLeukemia, Myeloid, Acute, LymphomaArmsPhototherapy system CareMin650TM
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of a clinical encounter time protection program on pain management: a retrospective difference-in-difference study.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2025
    Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Clement P BuclinDivision of Quality of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Adriana UribeDivision of Quality of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Justine E DaverioDivision of Quality of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Arnaud IseliDivision of Quality of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Johan N SiebertDepartment of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Guy HallerDivision of Quality of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Stéphane CullatiDivision of Quality of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Delphine S CourvoisierDivision of Quality of Care, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: No French validated concise scales are available for measuring the experience of inpatients in pediatrics. This study aims to adapt the adult PPE-15 to a pediatric population, and translating it in French, as well as to establish reference values for adults, teenagers, and parents of young children. Methods: Cultural adaptation involved forward and backward translations, along with pretests in all three populations. Dimensional structure and internal consistency were assessed using principal component analysis, exploratory factor analysis, and Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was assessed by examining established associations between patient satisfaction and inpatient variables, including length of stay, and preventable readmission. Results: A total of 25,626 adults, 293 teenagers and 1,640 parents of young children completed the French questionnaires. Factor analysis supported a single dimension (Cronbach's alpha: adults: 0.85, teenagers: 0.82, parents: 0.80). Construct validity showed the expected pattern of association, with dissatisfaction correlating with patient- and stay-related factors, notably length of stay, and readmission. Conclusion: The French versions of the PPE-15 for adults, teenagers and parents of pediatric patients stand as valid and reliable instruments for gauging patient satisfaction regarding their hospital stay after discharge.

Indexed as

EmotionsInpatientsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFactor Analysis, StatisticalHumansParentsPatient Outcome Assessmenthealthcare accesshealthcare evaluationhealthcare qualityhospitalsinpatients backgroundpatient satisfactionvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID38439757
PMCPMC10910618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.