ArticleScience progress
What are optimum cycles for immediate primary closure of large cutaneous defects?
Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn the reconstruction of large complex cutaneous wounds, a myriad of mechanical devices has been designed to facilitate primary wound closure. However, there is a dearth of studies elucidating how best to achieve optimum use and efficiency of skin stretching (SS) when using the device for immediate primary closure of defects.
methodsSkin defect wounds (7 × 7 cm) were prepared on the back of three Bama miniature pigs. A total of 15 cycles of SS (cycle loading) were subsequently performed on the skin edges of the wound by EASApprox® SS system. Then, the changes in equidistant points were recorded after each cycle. After the SS test, all wounds were sutured under low tension.
resultsSkin elongation was observed at all equidistant points on the back wounds of three Bama miniature pigs. Up to an additional 1.10 to 3.75 cm of tissue was garnered. The maximum skin elongation was typically achieved within eight cycles of stretching and relaxation. Beyond this range, additional stretching cycles did not result in further skin extension.
conclusionThere may be a close link between mobilization range and the times of acute cyclic stretching (cycle loading) during the process of primary wound closure. However, larger studies are required to further evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.