Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439575›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of botany2024

Defining autopolyploidy: Cytology, genetics, and taxonomy.

Zhenling Lv, Charles Addo Nyarko, Vinita Ramtekey, Helen Behn, Annaliese S Mason

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of botany, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
15.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Phylogenetic networks empower biodiversity research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Chromosome-scale reference genome ofApplications in plant sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Zhenling LvPlant Breeding Department, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Charles Addo NyarkoPlant Breeding Department, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Vinita RamtekeyPlant Breeding Department, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Helen BehnPlant Breeding Department, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.
Annaliese S MasonPlant Breeding Department, University of Bonn, Kirschallee 1, 53115, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2701-7964
University of Bonn · DE

Funding

European Research Council 101087575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autopolyploidy is taxonomically defined as the presence of more than two copies of each genome within an organism or species, where the genomes present must all originate within the same species. Alternatively, "genetic" or "cytological" autopolyploidy is defined by polysomic inheritance: random pairing and segregation of the four (or more) homologous chromosomes present, with no preferential pairing partners. In this review, we provide an overview of methods used to categorize species as taxonomic and cytological autopolyploids, including both modern and obsolete cytological methods, marker-segregation-based and genomics methods. Subsequently, we also investigated how frequently polysomic inheritance has been reliably documented in autopolyploids. Pure or predominantly polysomic inheritance was documented in 39 of 43 putative autopolyploid species where inheritance data was available (91%) and in seven of eight synthetic autopolyploids, with several cases of more mixed inheritance within species. We found no clear cases of autopolyploids with disomic inheritance, which was likely a function of our search methodology. Interestingly, we found seven species with purely polysomic inheritance and another five species with partial or predominant polysomic inheritance that appear to be taxonomic allopolyploids. Our results suggest that observations of polysomic inheritance can lead to relabeling of taxonomically allopolyploid species as autopolyploid and highlight the need for further cytogenetic and genomic investigation into polyploid origins and inheritance types.

Indexed as

PolyploidyChromosomes, PlantGenome, PlantPlantsautopolyploidycytogeneticsdisomic inheritancemultivalent formationpolyploid marker segregationpolysomic inheritancespecies definitionstaxonomy

Identifiers

PMID38439575
PMCPMC7618257
OpenAlexW4392464734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.