Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439546›Full record

ArticleGut microbes

A metagenomic prospective cohort study on gut microbiome composition and clinical infection in small bowel transplantation.

Archana Madhav, Rachel Bousfield, Joana Pereira-Dias, Claire Cormie, Sally Forrest, Jacqueline Keane, Leanne Kermack, Ellen Higginson, Gordon Dougan, Harry Spiers and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gut microbes. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trending ileal microbiome dysbiosis over time as an early assessment of intestinal transplant rejection risk.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Archana MadhavCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Rachel BousfieldCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7828-4048
Joana Pereira-DiasCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Claire CormieCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sally ForrestCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Jacqueline KeaneCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Leanne KermackCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Ellen HigginsonCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Gordon DouganCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Harry SpiersDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Dunecan MasseyDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Lisa SharkeyDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Charlotte RutterDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Jeremy WoodwardDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Neil RussellDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Irum AminDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Andrew ButlerDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Kayleigh AtkinsonDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Tom DymondDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Josefin Bartholdson ScottCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Stephen BakerCambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Effrossyni Gkrania-KlotsasDepartment of Medicine / Department of Surgery, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, UK.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two-thirds of small-bowel transplantation (SBT) recipients develop bacteremia, with the majority of infections occurring within 3 months post-transplant. Sepsis-related mortality occurs in 31% of patients and is commonly caused by bacteria of gut origin, which are thought to translocate across the implanted organ. Serial post-transplant surveillance endoscopies provide an opportunity to study whether the composition of the ileal and colonic microbiota can predict the emergence as well as the pathogen of subsequent clinical infections in the SBT patient population. Five participants serially underwent aspiration of ileal and colonic bowel effluents at transplantation and during follow-up endoscopy either until death or for up to 3 months post-SBT. We performed whole-metagenome sequencing (WMS) of 40 bowel effluent samples and compared the results with clinical infection episodes. Microbiome composition was concordant between participants and timepoint-matched ileal and colonic samples. Four out of five (4/5) participants had clinically significant infections thought to be of gut origin. Bacterial translocation from the gut was observed in 3/5 patients with bacterial infectious etiologies. In all three cases, the pathogens had demonstrably colonized the gut between 1-10 days prior to invasive clinical infection. Recipients with better outcomes received donor grafts with higher alpha diversity. There was an increase in the number of antimicrobial resistance genes associated with longer hospital stay for all participants. This metagenomic study provides preliminary evidence to support the pathogen translocation hypothesis of gut-origin sepsis in the SBT cohort. Ileal and colonic microbiome compositions were concordant; therefore, fecal metagenomic analysis could be a useful surveillance tool for impeding infection with specific gut-residing pathogens.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaSepsisHumansMetagenomeProspective Studiesantibioticsantimicrobial resistancebacterial translocationgut microbiomegut-origin sepsismetagenomicssepsisSmall bowel transplantation

Identifiers

PMID38439546
PMCPMC10936650
OpenAlexW4392464410

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.