Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439089›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2024

Teacher support in language learning: a picture of the effects on language progress, academic immunity, and academic enjoyment.

Lan Huang, Anwar Hammad Al-Rashidi, Sania Bayat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lan HuangSchool of Humanities and Foreign Languages, Hunan Agricultural University, 410125, Hunan, China.
Anwar Hammad Al-RashidiDepartment of Psychology, College of Education, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5334-2544
Sania BayatDepartment of English Literature, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Rasht Branch, Islamic Azad University, Rasht, Iran. saniabayat@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6655-3244

Funding

Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University PSAU/2023/R/1445
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Teacher support encompasses the provision of educational, instrumental, sentimental, or evaluative assistance by a teacher to a student, regardless of the setting. Learning a new language brings with it different ups and downs that may hinder the actual progress of the learners. The journey of learning may be made easier by supportive instructors. During the course of this inquiry, two groups (85 participants in total) including the experimental and control groups were chosen to gauge the influence of Teacher support in virtual instruction on English as a foreign language (EFL) learners' progress, academic immunity, and academic enjoyment. In contrast to the experimental group (EG, n = 42), which had the chance to connect with a teacher in order to ask questions and get feedback plus the off-line education, the control group (CG, n = 44) was subjected to off-line instruction of language input (Top Notch 3). The status of the participants' language growth, immunity, and enjoyment was investigated both before and after the treatment. The findings of independent samples t-tests as well as the multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) indicated that learners in EG did much better than their counterparts in CG. In addition, the ramifications and recommendations for potential future directions are analyzed.

Indexed as

Educational PersonnelPleasureHumansLanguageLanguage DevelopmentLearningAcademic enjoymentAcademic immunityEFL learnersLanguage progressTeacher support

Identifiers

PMID38439089
PMCPMC10913244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.