Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439059›Full record

ArticleBMC medical education2024

Development and validation of the physician self-efficacy to manage emotional challenges Scale (PSMEC).

Maria Weurlander, Linda Wänström, Astrid Seeberger, Annalena Lönn, Linda Barman, Håkan Hult, Robert Thornberg, Annika Wernerson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Achalasia: Physician Practices and Knowledge in Türkiye.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Weurlander *Department of Education, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden. maria.weurlander@edu.su.se.
Linda Wänström *Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Astrid SeebergerDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Annalena LönnDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Linda BarmanDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Håkan HultDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Robert ThornbergDepartment of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Annika WernersonDepartment of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical students experience emotional challenges during their undergraduate education, often related to work-based learning. Consequently, they may experience feelings of uncertainty and self-doubt, which can negatively affect their well-being. Therefore, it is crucial to support students' development of their ability to manage distressful situations. Self-efficacy beliefs may be a central aspect of supporting them in this development, and have been shown to relate to resilient factors such as students' motivation, learning, and well-being.

methodsWe constructed a scale to measure medical students' physician self-efficacy to manage emotional challenges during work-based learning, the PSMEC scale. The aim of the present study was to evaluate some of the psychometric properties of the PSMEC scale. The scale consists of 17 items covering five subscales: (1) medical knowledge and competence, (2) communication with difficult patients and delivering bad news, (3) being questioned and challenged, (4) educative competence in patient encounters, and (5) ability to establish and maintain relationships with healthcare professionals. Data were collected from 655 medical students from all seven medical schools in Sweden. To investigate the scale's dimensionality and measurement invariance with regard to gender and time in education, single and multiple group confirmatory factor models were estimated using techniques suitable for ordered categorical data. Measures of Cronbach's alpha were calculated to evaluate internal consistency.

resultsThe scale showed good internal consistency on both the global dimension and the five subdimensions of self-efficacy. In addition, the scale was shown to be measurement invariant across genders and times in education, indicating that the scale means of male and female medical students and the scale means of students at the middle and end of their education can be compared.

conclusionsThe physician self-efficacy to manage emotional challenges scale demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties, with regards to dimensionality, internal consistency, and measurement invariance relating to gender and time in education, and this study supports the usefulness of this scale when measuring self-efficacy in relation to emotional challenges.

Indexed as

PhysiciansStudents, MedicalEducational StatusFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleSelf EfficacyEmotional challengesMeasurement invarianceMedical studentsPhysician self-efficacySelf-efficacy questionnaireValidation

Identifiers

PMID38439059
PMCPMC10913217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.