ArticleBMC psychiatry2024
A causal relationship between panic disorder and risk of alzheimer disease: a two-sample mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundObservational studies have suggested a link between panic disorder (PD) and Alzheimer disease (AD). This study aimed to identify the underlying association of PD with the risk of AD using Mendelian randomization.
methodsGenetic instrumental variables (IVs) were retrieved in the genome-wide association study between PD and AD. Then, five different models, namely inverse variance weighting (IVW), weighted median, weighted mode, MR-Egger and MR-robust adjusted profile scores (MR-RAPS), were used for MR Analysis. Finally, the heterogeneity and pleiotropy of identified IVs were verified by multiple sensitivity tests.
resultsThe Cochran's Q test based on MR Egger and IVW showed that no evidence of heterogeneity was found in the effects of instrumental variables, so a fixed-effect model was used. IVW analysis (OR 1.000479, 95% CI [1.000147056, 1.000811539], p = 0.005) indicated that PD was associated with an increased risk of AD, and a causal association existed between them. Meanwhile, weighted median (OR 1.000513373, 95% CI [1.000052145, 1.000974814], p = 0.029) and MR-RAPS (OR 1.000510118, 95% CI [1.000148046, 1.00087232], p = 0.006) also showed the similar findings. In addition, extensive sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness and accuracy of these results.
conclusionThis investigation provides evidence of a potential causal relationship between PD and the increased risk of AD. Based on our MR results, when diagnosing and treating patients with PD, clinicians should pay more attention to their AD-related symptoms to choose therapeutic measures or minimize comorbidities. Furthermore, the development of drugs that improve both PD and AD may better treat patients with these comorbidities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.