Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38439040›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2024

High-volume prostate biopsy core involvement is not associated with an increased risk of cancer recurrence following 5-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy monotherapy.

Jonathan W Lischalk, Astrid Sanchez, Vianca F Santos, Christopher Mendez, Meredith Akerman, Todd Carpenter, Moses Tam, David Byun, David R Wise, Anand Mahadevan and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jonathan W LischalkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, 150 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY, 10023, USA. jonathan.lischalk@nyulangone.org.
Astrid SanchezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
Vianca F SantosDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, 150 Amsterdam Ave., New York, NY, 10023, USA.
Christopher MendezDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
Meredith AkermanDivision of Health Services Research, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
Todd CarpenterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
Moses TamDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
David ByunDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
David R WiseDepartment of Medicine, Perlmutter Cancer Center at NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Anand MahadevanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Andrew EvansDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
William HuangDepartment of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Aaron KatzDepartment of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
Herbert LeporDepartment of Urology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10017, USA.
Jonathan A HaasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Perlmutter Cancer Center at New York University Langone Hospital-Long Island, Mineola, NY, 11501, USA.
NYU Langone Health · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePercentage of positive cores involved on a systemic prostate biopsy has been established as a risk factor for adverse oncologic outcomes and is a National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) independent parameter for unfavorable intermediate-risk disease. Most data from a radiation standpoint was published in an era of conventional fractionation. We explore whether the higher biological dose delivered with SBRT can mitigate this risk factor.

methodsA large single institutional database was interrogated to identify all patients diagnosed with localized prostate cancer (PCa) treated with 5-fraction SBRT without ADT. Pathology results were reviewed to determine detailed core involvement as well as Gleason score (GS). High-volume biopsy core involvement was defined as ≥ 50%. Weighted Gleason core involvement was reviewed, giving higher weight to higher-grade cancer. The PSA kinetics and oncologic outcomes were analyzed for association with core involvement.

resultsFrom 2009 to 2018, 1590 patients were identified who underwent SBRT for localized PCa. High-volume core involvement was a relatively rare event observed in 19% of our cohort, which was observed more in patients with small prostates (p < 0.0001) and/or intermediate-risk disease (p = 0.005). Higher PSA nadir was observed in those patients with low-volume core involvement within the intermediate-risk cohort (p = 0.004), which was confirmed when core involvement was analyzed as a continuous variable weighted by Gleason score (p = 0.049). High-volume core involvement was not associated with biochemical progression (p = 0.234).

conclusionsWith a median follow-up of over 4 years, biochemical progression was not associated with pretreatment high-volume core involvement for patients treated with 5-fraction SBRT alone. In the era of prostate SBRT and MRI-directed prostate biopsies, the use of high-volume core involvement as an independent predictor of unfavorable intermediate risk disease should be revisited.

Indexed as

Prostatic NeoplasmsRadiosurgeryBiopsyHumansMaleProstateProstate-Specific AntigenProstate-Specific AntigenBiopsy core involvementGleason scoreHigh-volume core involvementProstate cancerPSASBRT

Identifiers

PMID38439040
PMCPMC10913228
OpenAlexW4392367196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.