Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438974›Full record

SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2024

Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin in adult non-neutropenic cancer patients with suspected infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yi-Chih Lee, Hsin-Tzu Yeh, Sz-Wei Lu, Yi-Chun Tsai, Yu-Chen Tsai, Chieh-Ching Yen

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. [Antibiotic stewardship-an update : Ongoing development of an initiative].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Clinical features, procalcitonin concentration, and bacterial infection in febrile hospitalized cancer patients: a descriptive study and association analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yi-Chih LeeDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5 Fushing St., Gueishan Shiang, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Hsin-Tzu YehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5 Fushing St., Gueishan Shiang, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Sz-Wei LuDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital SongShan Branch, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Chun TsaiDepartment of Medicine, Critical Care, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Yu-Chen TsaiDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung, Taiwan.
Chieh-Ching YenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Linkou Branch, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No. 5 Fushing St., Gueishan Shiang, Taoyuan, Taiwan. chiehching74@gmail.com.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWKeelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWQueen Mary University of London · GBTaipei City Hospital · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProcalcitonin (PCT) has garnered attention as a potential diagnostic biomarker for infection in cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) and to compare it with C-reactive protein (CRP) in adult non-neutropenic cancer patients with suspected infection.

methodsA systematic literature search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify all relevant diagnostic accuracy studies. Original articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of PCT for infection detection in adult patients with solid or hematological malignancies were included. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, area under the hierarchical summary receiver operator characteristic (HSROC) curve, and corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated.

resultsSeven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT were 60% (95% CI [45-74%]) and 78% (95% CI [69-86%]). The diagnostic odds ratio was estimated at 5.47 (95% CI [2.86-10.46]). Three studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of PCT and CRP. The pooled sensitivity and specificity values for PCT were 57% (95% CI [26-83%]) and 75% (95% CI [68-82%]), and those for CRP were 67% (95% CI [35-88%]) and 73% (95% CI [69-77%]). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of PCT and CRP did not differ significantly (p = 0.61 and p = 0.63). The diagnostic accuracy of PCT was similar to that of CRP as measured by the area under the HSROC curve (0.73, CI = 0.61-0.91 vs. 0.74, CI = 0.61-0.95, p = 0.93).

conclusionWhile elevated PCT levels can be indicative of potential infection, they should not be solely relied upon to exclude infection. We recommend not using the PCT test in isolation; Instead, it should be carefully interpreted in the context of clinical findings.

Indexed as

Hematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasmsAdultC-Reactive ProteinHumansOdds RatioProcalcitoninC-Reactive ProteinProcalcitoninBiomarkerInfectionmeta-analysisProcalcitonin

Identifiers

PMID38438974
PMCPMC10910706
OpenAlexW4392375341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.