Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438947›Full record

ArticleJournal of biological engineering2024

Structural and practical identifiability analysis in bioengineering: a beginner's guide.

Linda Wanika, Joseph R Egan, Nivedhitha Swaminathan, Carlos A Duran-Villalobos, Juergen Branke, Stephen Goldrick, Mike Chappell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biological engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifiability and model selection frameworks for models of high-grade glioma response to chemoradiation.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linda WanikaSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom.
Joseph R EganDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Nivedhitha SwaminathanDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Carlos A Duran-VillalobosDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Juergen BrankeWarwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.
Stephen GoldrickDepartment of Biochemical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mike ChappellSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom. m.j.chappell@warwick.ac.uk.

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council EP/P006485/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancements in digital technology have brought modelling to the forefront in many disciplines from healthcare to architecture. Mathematical models, often represented using parametrised sets of ordinary differential equations, can be used to characterise different processes. To infer possible estimates for the unknown parameters, these models are usually calibrated using associated experimental data. Structural and practical identifiability analyses are a key component that should be assessed prior to parameter estimation. This is because identifiability analyses can provide insights as to whether or not a parameter can take on single, multiple, or even infinitely or countably many values which will ultimately have an impact on the reliability of the parameter estimates. Also, identifiability analyses can help to determine whether the data collected are sufficient or of good enough quality to truly estimate the parameters or if more data or even reparameterization of the model is necessary to proceed with the parameter estimation process. Thus, such analyses also provide an important role in terms of model design (structural identifiability analysis) and the collection of experimental data (practical identifiability analysis). Despite the popularity of using data to estimate the values of unknown parameters, structural and practical identifiability analyses of these models are often overlooked. Possible reasons for non-consideration of application of such analyses may be lack of awareness, accessibility, and usability issues, especially for more complicated models and methods of analysis. The aim of this study is to introduce and perform both structural and practical identifiability analyses in an accessible and informative manner via application to well established and commonly accepted bioengineering models. This will help to improve awareness of the importance of this stage of the modelling process and provide bioengineering researchers with an understanding of how to utilise the insights gained from such analyses in future model development.

Identifiers

PMID38438947
PMCPMC11465550

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.