Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438840›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

De novo assembly and annotation of the Patagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) genome.

David Ryder, David Stone, Diana Minardi, Ainsley Riley, Justin Avant, Lisa Cross, Marta Soeffker, Deborah Davidson, Andrew Newman, Peter Thomson and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

David RyderCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK. david.ryder@cefas.gov.uk.
David StoneCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.
Diana MinardiCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.
Ainsley RileyCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.
Justin AvantCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.
Lisa CrossCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.
Marta SoeffkerCentre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.
Deborah DavidsonArgos Froyanes Ltd, GX11 1AA, Gibraltar, Gibraltar.
Andrew NewmanArgos Froyanes Ltd, GX11 1AA, Gibraltar, Gibraltar.
Peter ThomsonArgos Froyanes Ltd, GX11 1AA, Gibraltar, Gibraltar.
Chris Darby *Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.
Ronny van Aerle *Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science (Cefas), Lowestoft, Suffolk, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2605-6518
Centre for Environment, Fisheries and Aquaculture Science · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatagonian toothfish (Dissostichus eleginoides) is an economically and ecologically important fish species in the family Nototheniidae. Juveniles occupy progressively deeper waters as they mature and grow, and adults have been caught as deep as 2500 m, living on or in just above the southern shelves and slopes around the sub-Antarctic islands of the Southern Ocean. As apex predators, they are a key part of the food web, feeding on a variety of prey, including krill, squid, and other fish. Despite its importance, genomic sequence data, which could be used for more accurate dating of the divergence between Patagonian and Antarctic toothfish, or establish whether it shares adaptations to temperature with fish living in more polar or equatorial climes, has so far been limited.

resultsA high-quality D. eleginoides genome was generated using a combination of Illumina, PacBio and Omni-C sequencing technologies. To aid the genome annotation, the transcriptome derived from a variety of toothfish tissues was also generated using both short and long read sequencing methods. The final genome assembly was 797.8 Mb with a N50 scaffold length of 3.5 Mb. Approximately 31.7% of the genome consisted of repetitive elements. A total of 35,543 putative protein-coding regions were identified, of which 50% have been functionally annotated. Transcriptomics analysis showed that approximately 64% of the predicted genes (22,617 genes) were found to be expressed in the tissues sampled. Comparative genomics analysis revealed that the anti-freeze glycoprotein (AFGP) locus of D. eleginoides does not contain any AFGP proteins compared to the same locus in the Antarctic toothfish (Dissostichus mawsoni). This is in agreement with previously published results looking at hybridization signals and confirms that Patagonian toothfish do not possess AFGP coding sequences in their genome.

conclusionsWe have assembled and annotated the Patagonian toothfish genome, which will provide a valuable genetic resource for ecological and evolutionary studies on this and other closely related species.

Indexed as

PerciformesAnimalsAntarctic RegionsAntifreeze ProteinsBiological EvolutionGenomicsAntifreeze ProteinsAnti-freeze glycoproteinDissostichus eleginoidesIllumina sequencingNototheniidaePacBio sequencing

Identifiers

PMID38438840
PMCPMC10910785
OpenAlexW4392429630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.