Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438776›Full record

SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024

Histologic Subtypes in Endometriosis-Associated Ovarian Cancer and Ovarian Cancer Arising in Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Francesca Chiaffarino, Sonia Cipriani, Elena Ricci, Giovanna Esposito, Fabio Parazzini, Paolo Vercellini

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Ovarian remnant syndrome: an unsuspected diagnosis.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2025
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca ChiaffarinoGynaecology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6009-8108
Sonia CiprianiGynaecology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy. sonia.cipriani@policlinico.mi.it.ORCID 0000-0002-0530-499X
Elena RicciDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5279-0444
Giovanna EspositoDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7894-4456
Fabio ParazziniDepartment of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5624-4854
Paolo VercelliniGynaecology Unit, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Commenda 12, 20122, Milan, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4195-0996
University of Milan · ITFondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The definition of the association between ovarian cancer and endometriosis was first reported by Sampson in 1925. He identified the following criteria: (a) clear evidence of endometriosis in proximity to the tumour, (b) exclusion of a metastatic tumour to the ovary, (c) presence of tissue resembling endometrial stroma surrounding epithelial glands. The naming of these cancers is "endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer" (EAOC). Scott proposed an additional stringent criterion: evidence of histological transition from endometriosis to cancer is to define "ovarian cancer arising in endometriosis" (OCAE). The aim of this systematic review is to analyse the distribution of different ovarian cancer histotypes in EAOC and OCAE to understand their similarities and differences. A total of 31 studies were included. Four studies added data for both EAOC and OCAE. Twenty-three studies were selected for EAOC, with a total of 800 patients, and 12 studies were selected for OCAE, with a total of 375 patients. The results show no significant differences in the distribution of histotypes in the two populations analysed. Clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and endometrioid carcinoma (EC) were the most common subtypes and were less frequent in EAOC compared to OCAE; the odd ratios were 0.58 (0.26-1.29) and 0.65 (0.33-1.26) respectively, although the difference was not statistically significant. The other histotypes were present in small proportions. This analysis shows that the histological profiles of EAOC and OCAE are similar, suggesting a similar aetiopathological mechanism, which requires further research to investigate whether EAOC and OCAE may be in the same way but at different points of the process to malignancy or have different pathways of progression to malignancy.

Indexed as

EndometriosisOvarian NeoplasmsAdenocarcinoma, Clear CellCarcinoma, EndometrioidFemaleHumansEndometriosisHistologyOvarian neoplasm

Identifiers

PMID38438776
PMCPMC11111532
OpenAlexW4392382691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.