Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438766›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2024

Clinical presentation and extent of resection impacts progression-free survival in spinal ependymomas.

Mark A Davison, Daniel T Lilly, Arpan A Patel, Ahmed Kashkoush, Xiaoying Chen, Wei Wei, Edward C Benzel, Richard A Prayson, Samuel Chao, Lilyana Angelov

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Outcomes after surgical resection of spinal ependymomas: extent of resection, imaging phenotype, and survival.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Clinical profile and outcomes of pediatric ependymoma: a 10-year retrospective analysis from a resource-limited setting.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark A DavisonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Daniel T LillyDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Arpan A PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Ahmed KashkoushDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Xiaoying ChenDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Wei WeiDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Edward C BenzelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Richard A PraysonDepartment of Anatomic Pathology, The Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Samuel ChaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Lilyana AngelovDepartment of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA. angelol@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · USCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePrimary treatment of spinal ependymomas involves surgical resection, however recurrence ranges between 50 and 70%. While the association of survival outcomes with lesion extent of resection (EOR) has been studied, existing analyses are limited by small samples and archaic data resulting in an inhomogeneous population. We investigated the relationship between EOR and survival outcomes, chiefly overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), in a large contemporary cohort of spinal ependymoma patients.

methodsAdult patients diagnosed with a spinal ependymoma from 2006 to 2021 were identified from an institutional registry. Patients undergoing primary surgical resection at our institution, ≥ 1 routine follow-up MRI, and pathologic diagnosis of ependymoma were included. Records were reviewed for demographic information, EOR, lesion characteristics, and pre-/post-operative neurologic symptoms. EOR was divided into 2 classifications: gross total resection (GTR) and subtotal resection (STR). Log-rank test was used to compare OS and PFS between patient groups.

resultsSixty-nine patients satisfied inclusion criteria, with 79.7% benefitting from GTR. The population was 56.2% male with average age of 45.7 years, and median follow-up duration of 58 months. Cox multivariate model demonstrated significant improvement in PFS when a GTR was attained (p <.001). Independently ambulatory patients prior to surgery had superior PFS (p <.001) and OS (p =.05). In univariate analyses, patients with a syrinx had improved PFS (p =.03) and were more likely to benefit from GTR (p =.01). Alternatively, OS was not affected by EOR (p =.78).

conclusionsIn this large, contemporary series of adult spinal ependymoma patients, we demonstrated improvements in PFS when GTR was achieved.

Indexed as

EpendymomaNeurosurgical ProceduresProgression-Free SurvivalSpinal Cord NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateYoung AdultGross total resectionProgression-free survivalSpinal ependymomaSurgical resectionSurvival

Identifiers

PMID38438766
PMCPMC11096218
OpenAlexW4392381917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.