Trial reportCanadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie2024
The 90% effective dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine for Cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia in parturients with super obesity: an up-down sequential allocation study.
Trial report in Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03781388 (ED90 for Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Super Obese Parturients), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
ED90 for Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Spinal Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery in Super Obese Parturients
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of neuraxial anesthesia and analgesia strategies for obese parturients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Article
- Spinal anesthetic dose following removal of an indwelling labor epidural catheter for patients who underwent unscheduled intrapartum cesarean delivery stratified by height and weight: a single-center retrospective study.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the 90% effective dose (ED
methodsWe enrolled parturients with BMI ≥ 50 kg·m
resultsWe enrolled 45 parturients and included 42 in the analysis. All doses achieved a T6 level within ten minutes, and the primary outcome occurred in 0/1 (0%) of the 9.75-mg doses, 2/3 (67%) of the 10.5-mg doses, 21/27 (78%) of the 11.25-mg doses, and 11/11 (100%) of the 12-mg doses. The ED
conclusionThe estimated ED STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03781388); first submitted 18 December 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.