Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438657›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2024

Many morphs: Parsing gesture signals from the noise.

Alexander Mielke, Gal Badihi, Kirsty E Graham, Charlotte Grund, Chie Hashimoto, Alex K Piel, Alexandra Safryghin, Katie E Slocombe, Fiona Stewart, Claudia Wilke and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Forms and Structures of Chimpanzee Algae Fishing.American journal of primatology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alexander MielkeWild Minds Lab, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK. mielke.alexand@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8847-6665
Gal BadihiWild Minds Lab, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Kirsty E GrahamWild Minds Lab, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Charlotte GrundWild Minds Lab, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Chie HashimotoPrimate Research Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Alex K PielDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.
Alexandra SafryghinWild Minds Lab, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.
Katie E SlocombeDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Fiona StewartDepartment of Anthropology, University College London, London, UK.
Claudia WilkeDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York, UK.
Klaus ZuberbühlerInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Catherine HobaiterWild Minds Lab, School of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parsing signals from noise is a general problem for signallers and recipients, and for researchers studying communicative systems. Substantial efforts have been invested in comparing how other species encode information and meaning, and how signalling is structured. However, research depends on identifying and discriminating signals that represent meaningful units of analysis. Early approaches to defining signal repertoires applied top-down approaches, classifying cases into predefined signal types. Recently, more labour-intensive methods have taken a bottom-up approach describing detailed features of each signal and clustering cases based on patterns of similarity in multi-dimensional feature-space that were previously undetectable. Nevertheless, it remains essential to assess whether the resulting repertoires are composed of relevant units from the perspective of the species using them, and redefining repertoires when additional data become available. In this paper we provide a framework that takes data from the largest set of wild chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes) gestures currently available, splitting gesture types at a fine scale based on modifying features of gesture expression using latent class analysis (a model-based cluster detection algorithm for categorical variables), and then determining whether this splitting process reduces uncertainty about the goal or community of the gesture. Our method allows different features of interest to be incorporated into the splitting process, providing substantial future flexibility across, for example, species, populations, and levels of signal granularity. Doing so, we provide a powerful tool allowing researchers interested in gestural communication to establish repertoires of relevant units for subsequent analyses within and between systems of communication.

Indexed as

Animal CommunicationGesturesPan troglodytesAlgorithmsAnimalsCluster AnalysisFemaleMaleChimpanzeesGestureLatent class analysisMorphRepertoire

Identifiers

PMID38438657
PMCPMC11362259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.