Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438539›Full record

ArticleNature plants2024

Blocking then stinging as a case of two-step evolution of defensive cage architectures in herbivore-driven ecosystems.

Artémis Anest, Yanis Bouchenak-Khelladi, Tristan Charles-Dominique, Félix Forest, Yves Caraglio, Gareth P Hempson, Olivier Maurin, Kyle W Tomlinson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Artémis AnestCenter for Integrative Conservation and Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests and Asian Elephants, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, China. artemis.anest@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5318-2827
Yanis Bouchenak-KhelladiAgroécologie, Univ. Bourgogne, Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté, INRAE, Institut Agro, Dijon, France.
Tristan Charles-DominiqueAMAP, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Félix ForestRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Yves CaraglioAMAP, Univ Montpellier, CIRAD, CNRS, INRAE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
Gareth P HempsonEcology and Environmental Change, School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8055-4895
Olivier MaurinRoyal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, UK.
Kyle W TomlinsonCenter for Integrative Conservation and Yunnan Key Laboratory for Conservation of Tropical Rainforests and Asian Elephants, Xishuangbanna Tropical Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Menglun, Mengla, China. kyle.tomlinson@xtbg.org.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-3039-6766

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dense branching and spines are common features of plant species in ecosystems with high mammalian herbivory pressure. While dense branching and spines can inhibit herbivory independently, when combined, they form a powerful defensive cage architecture. However, how cage architecture evolved under mammalian pressure has remained unexplored. Here we show how dense branching and spines emerged during the age of mammalian radiation in the Combretaceae family and diversified in herbivore-driven ecosystems in the tropics. Phylogenetic comparative methods revealed that modern plant architectural strategies defending against large mammals evolved via a stepwise process. First, dense branching emerged under intermediate herbivory pressure, followed by the acquisition of spines that supported higher speciation rates under high herbivory pressure. Our study highlights the adaptive value of dense branching as part of a herbivore defence strategy and identifies large mammal herbivory as a major selective force shaping the whole plant architecture of woody plants.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEcosystemHerbivoryAnimalsMammalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID38438539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.