Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438510›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

The influence of left bundle branch block on myocardial T1 mapping.

Antonia Petersen, Sebastian Niko Nagel, Bernd Hamm, Thomas Elgeti, Lars-Arne Schaafs

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Antonia PetersenDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany. antonia.petersen@charite.de.
Sebastian Niko NagelAcademic Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Paediatric Radiology, Protestant Hospital of the Bethel Foundation, Bielefeld University, Medical School and University Medical Center East Westphalia-Lippe, Burgsteig 13, 33617, Bielefeld, Germany.
Bernd HammDepartment of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas Elgeti *Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Lars-Arne Schaafs *Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 30, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEBielefeld University · DEFreie Universität Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue characterisation using T1 mapping has become an established magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique to detect myocardial diseases. This retrospective study aimed to determine the influence of left bundle branch block (LBBB) on T1 mapping at 1.5 T. Datasets of 36 patients with LBBB and 27 healthy controls with T1 mapping (Modified Look-Locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI), 5(3)3 sampling) were included. T1 relaxation times were determined on mid-cavity short-axis images. R

Indexed as

Bundle-Branch BlockMyocardiumArtifactsChromosome InversionHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38438510
PMCPMC10912434
OpenAlexW4392467481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.