Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438456›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Extracellular vesicles as potential biomarkers for diagnosis and recurrence detection of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Mazen A Juratli, Nicola S Pollmann, Elsie Oppermann, Annika Mohr, Dhruvajyoti Roy, Andreas Schnitzbauer, Sabine Michalik, Thomas Vogl, Nikolas H Stoecklein, Philipp Houben and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Diagnostic and prognostic significance of circulating extracellular vesicles in gastrointestinal cancers.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mazen A JuratliDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany. Mazen.juratli@ukmuenster.de.
Nicola S PollmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Elsie OppermannDepartment of General, Transplant and Thorax Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe University, VisceralFrankfurt, Germany.
Annika MohrDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Dhruvajyoti RoyDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Andreas SchnitzbauerDepartment of General, Transplant and Thorax Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe University, VisceralFrankfurt, Germany.
Sabine MichalikDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Thomas VoglDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Nikolas H StoeckleinGeneral, Visceral and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital and Medical Faculty of the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Philipp HoubenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Shadi KatouDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Felix BeckerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Jens Peter HoelzenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Andreas AndreouDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Andreas PascherDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
Wolf O BechsteinDepartment of General, Transplant and Thorax Surgery, Frankfurt University Hospital, Goethe University, VisceralFrankfurt, Germany.
Benjamin StrueckerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Muenster University Hospital, Muenster University, Muenster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignant liver tumor and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. However, current diagnostic tools are often invasive and technically limited. In the last decade, non-invasive liquid biopsies have transformed the field of clinical oncology, showcasing the potential of various liquid-biopsy derived analytes, including extracellular vesicles (EVs), to diagnose and monitor HCC progression and metastatic spreading, serving as promising novel biomarkers. A prospective single-center cohort study including 37 HCC patients and 20 patients with non-malignant liver disease (NMLD), as a control group, was conducted. Serum EVs of both groups were analyzed before and after liver surgery. The study utilized microbead-based magnetic particle sorting and flow cytometry to detect 37 characteristic surface proteins of EVs. Furthermore, HCC patients who experienced tumor recurrence (R-HCC) within 12 months after surgery were compared to HCC patients without recurrence (NR-HCC). EVs of R-HCC patients (n = 12/20) showed significantly lower levels of CD31 compared to EVs of NR-HCC patients (p = 0.0033). EVs of NMLD-group showed significantly higher expressions of CD41b than EVs of HCC group (p = 0.0286). The study determined significant short-term changes in CD19 dynamics in EVs of the NMLD-group, with preoperative values being significantly higher than postoperative values (p = 0.0065). This finding of our pilot study suggests EVs could play a role as potential targets for the development of diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for the early and non-invasive detection of HCC recurrence. Further, more in-depth analysis of the specific EV markers are needed to corroborate their potential role as diagnostic and therapeutic targets for HCC.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, HepatocellularExtracellular VesiclesLiver NeoplasmsBiomarkersCohort StudiesHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesBiomarkersExtracellular vesiclesHepatocellular carcinomaNon-malignant liver diseaseRecurrenceSurgery

Identifiers

PMID38438456
PMCPMC10912302
OpenAlexW4392369070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.