ArticleScientific reports2024
Assessment of parental mosaicism rates in neurodevelopmental disorders caused by apparent de novo pathogenic variants using deep sequencing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Synonymous DLG4 Variant (c.771G>A) Causes Exon 9 Skipping via Paternal Germline Mosaicism in DLG4-Related Synaptopathy.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2026Article
- Inherited variants in autosomal dominant disease genes are a significant cause of fetal structural anomalies.Journal of medical genetics · 2026Article
- Case Report: First case of paternal mosaicism in Snijders Blok-Fisher syndrome.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Germline mosaicism in TCF20-associated neurodevelopmental disorders: a case study and literature review.Journal of human genetics · 2025Review
- Parental germline mosaicism in genome-wide phased de novo variants: Recurrence risk assessment and implications for precision genetic counselling.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- The Clinical Spectrum of Mosaic Genetic Disease.Genes · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While de novo variants (DNV) are overall at low risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies, a subset is at high risk due to parental mosaicism. Accurately identifying cases of parental mosaicism is therefore important for genetic counseling in clinical care. Some studies have investigated the rate of parental mosaics, but most were either limited by the sensitivity of the techniques (i.e. exome or genome sequencing), or focused on specific types of disease such as epileptic syndromes. This study aimed to determine the proportion of parental mosaicism among the DNV causing neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) in a series not enriched in epilepsy syndromes. We collected 189 patients with NDD-associated DNV. We applied a smMIP enrichment method and sequenced parental blood DNA samples to an average depth of 7000x. Power simulation indicated that mosaicism with an allelic fraction of 0.5% would have been detected for 87% of positions with 90% power. We observed seven parental mosaic variants (3.7% of families), of which four (2.1% of families) had an allelic fraction of less than 1%. In total, our study identifies a relatively low proportion of parental mosaicism in NDD-associated DNVs and raises the question of a biological mechanism behind the higher rates of parental mosaicism detected in other studies, particularly those focusing on epileptic syndromes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.