Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438425›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Design, construction and field testing of a manually feeding semiautomatic sugarcane dud chipper.

Abdallah Elshawadfy Elwakeel, Saher M A Mohamed, Abubakr Abdelwahab Tantawy, Abdelaziz M Okasha, Salah Elsayed, Osama Elsherbiny, Aitazaz A Farooque, Zaher Mundher Yaseen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Abdallah Elshawadfy ElwakeelAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Aswan University, Aswan, Egypt.
Saher M A MohamedGeneral Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Abubakr Abdelwahab TantawyAgronomy Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Minia University, Minya, Egypt.
Abdelaziz M OkashaDepartment of Agricultural Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, 33516, Egypt.
Salah ElsayedAgricultural Engineering, Evaluation of Natural Studies and Research Institute, University of Sadat City, Sadat City, 32897, Minufiya, Egypt.
Osama ElsherbinyAgricultural Engineering Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
Aitazaz A FarooqueFaculty of Sustainable Design Engineering, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PE, C1A4P3, Canada. afarooque@upei.ca.
Zaher Mundher YaseenCivil and Environmental Engineering Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, 31261, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia. z.yaseen@kfupm.edu.sa.
Aswan University · EGCairo University · EGKafrelsheikh University · EGKing Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals · SAMansoura University · EGMinia University · EGUniversity of Prince Edward Island · CAUniversity of Sadat City · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sugarcane is the main sugar crop, and sugar is an important agricultural product in Egypt. There are many problems with the technology used in the current planting method of sugarcane, which has a great impact on the planting quality of sugarcane, which have a series of problems, such as low cutting efficiency and poor quality. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to design, construct, and field testing of a semiautomatic sugarcane bud chipper assisted with pivot knives for cutting sugarcane buds and germinating them in plastic trays inside a greenhouse until they reached an average length of 35 cm, and then planting them in the field. In the field tests five cutting speeds (35, 40, 45, 50, and 56 rpm. (Revolution Per minute), three cutting knives (1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 mm) were used for cutting sugarcane stalks with four different diameters (1.32, 1.82, 2.43, and 2.68 cm). The obtained results showed that the values of the damage index and invisible losses were within acceptable limits (ranging between - 1.0 and 0.0) for all the variables under the test. Still, the lowest damage index and invisible losses were recorded with the buds that were cut with a knife of 1.5 mm thickness and cutting speeds less than 50 rpm. The skipping rate increases with the increase in cutting speed and stalk diameter, ranging between 0.0 to 13%. The maximum machine productivity was 110 Buds per minute at a cutting speed of 35 rpm and stalk diameter of 1.32 cm. The paper's findings have important application values for promoting the designing and development of sugarcane bud chipper and sugarcane planting technology in the future.

Indexed as

SaccharumAgricultureEgyptRecordsSugarsSugarsDamage indexInvisible lossesPhysical propertiesSemiautomatic sugarcane chipperSugarcane bud

Identifiers

PMID38438425
PMCPMC10912445
OpenAlexW4392757497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.