Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438299›Full record

ArticleAnnals of work exposures and health2024

Rapid fiber-detection technique by artificial intelligence in phase-contrast microscope images of simulated atmospheric samples.

Takashi Yamamoto, Kazuharu Iwasaki, Yukiko Iida, Ken-Ichi Yuki, Fumihiro Nakaji, Hayato Yamashiro, Toshiyuki Toyoguchi, Atsushi Terazono

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of work exposures and health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Takashi YamamotoNational Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.
Kazuharu IwasakiJapan NUS Co., Ltd, 7-5-25 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Yukiko IidaEnvironmental Control Center Co., Ltd, 3-7-23 Sanda-machi, Hachioji, Tokyo 193-0832, Japan.
Ken-Ichi YukiEnvironmental Control Center Co., Ltd, 3-7-23 Sanda-machi, Hachioji, Tokyo 193-0832, Japan.
Fumihiro NakajiJapan NUS Co., Ltd, 7-5-25 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Hayato YamashiroJapan NUS Co., Ltd, 7-5-25 Nishi-Shinjuku, Shinjuku, Tokyo 160-0023, Japan.
Toshiyuki ToyoguchiEnvironmental Control Center Co., Ltd, 3-7-23 Sanda-machi, Hachioji, Tokyo 193-0832, Japan.
Atsushi TerazonoNational Institute for Environmental Studies, 16-2 Onogawa, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8506, Japan.
Engineering Advancement Association of Japan · JPNational Institute for Environmental Studies · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the manufacture, import, and use of asbestos products have been completely abolished in Japan, the main cause of asbestos emissions into the atmosphere is the demolition and removal of buildings built with asbestos-containing materials. To detect and correct asbestos emissions from inappropriate demolition and removal operations at an early stage, a rapid method to measure atmospheric asbestos fibers is required. The current rapid measurement method is a combination of short-term atmospheric sampling and phase-contrast microscopy counting. However, visual counting takes a considerable amount of time and is not sufficiently fast. Using artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze microscope images to detect fibers may greatly reduce the time required for counting. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the use of AI image analysis for detecting fibers in phase-contrast microscope images. A series of simulated atmospheric samples prepared from standard samples of amosite and chrysotile were observed using a phase-contrast microscope. Images were captured, and training datasets were created from the counting results of expert analysts. We adopted 2 types of AI models-an instance segmentation model, namely the mask region-based convolutional neural network (Mask R-CNN), and a semantic segmentation model, namely the multi-level aggregation network (MA-Net)-that were trained to detect asbestos fibers. The accuracy of fiber detection achieved with the Mask R-CNN model was 57% for recall and 46% for precision, whereas the accuracy achieved with the MA-Net model was 95% for recall and 91% for precision. Therefore, satisfactory results were obtained with the MA-Net model. The time required for fiber detection was less than 1 s per image in both AI models, which was faster than the time required for counting by an expert analyst.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAsbestosMicroscopy, Phase-ContrastAsbestos, SerpentineAtmosphereEnvironmental MonitoringHumansJapanNeural Networks, ComputerAsbestosAsbestos, Serpentineartificial intelligenceasbestosphase-contrast microscopyrapid detection

Identifiers

PMID38438299
PMCPMC11033560
OpenAlexW4392757185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.