Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438218›Full record

Trial reportSaudi medical journal2024

Comparison of the popliteal artery and the capsule of the posterior knee (IPACK) block and the genicular nerve block in primary total knee arthroplasty: A prospective randomized trial.

Abdulrahim Dündar, Deniz İpek, Mehmet Yalvaç, Şehmuz Kaya

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Saudi medical journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Abdulrahim DündarFrom the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics' and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-2073
Deniz İpekFrom the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics' and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.
Mehmet YalvaçFrom the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics' and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.
Şehmuz KayaFrom the Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (Dündar, İpek) and from the Department of department of Anesthesiology (Yalvaç), Hitit University Erol Olçok Training and Research Hospital, Çorum; and from the Department of Orthopedics' and Traumatology (Kaya), Van Yüzüncüyıl University, Van Turkey.
Hitit Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the efficacy of genicular block and interspace between the popliteal artery and the posterior capsule (IPACK) block in the reduction of postoperative pain, the need for rescue analgesics, and the effects on a range of motion (ROM) in patients with TKA.

methodsThis prospective randomized controlled study was carried out between February and May 2023. Based on the block method, 60 participants were divided into three equal groups. These groups included the IPACK block group (n=20), the genicular block group (n=20), and control group (n=20). Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee Society score (KSS) and Oxford Knee score (OKS) were used for clinical evaluation in the postoperative period.

resultsThe KSS and OKS scores of the IPACK and GNB were significantly lower than the control group (

conclusionBoth GNB and IPACK blocks had a significant positive impact on postoperative pain scores within the initial 24 hours following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). In comparison with IPACK, GNB had lower opioid consumption in the early postoperative period while also promoting better mobilization.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeNerve BlockHumansPopliteal ArteryPostoperative PainProspective StudiesGNBIPACKpaintotal knee arthroplastyTUG

Identifiers

PMID38438218
PMCPMC11115387
OpenAlexW4392381691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.