Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438167›Full record

ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2024

Molecular GBM versus Histopathological GBM: Radiology-Pathology-Genetic Correlation and the New WHO 2021 Definition of Glioblastoma.

Amit Agarwal, Mark A Edgar, Amit Desai, Vivek Gupta, Neetu Soni, Girish Bathla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Chromosomal Instability Drives Glioblastoma Heterogeneity and Therapeutic Opportunities.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Enhancing the efficacy of VEGF inhibitors by co-inhibition of HIF in the treatment of glioblastoma.Apoptosis : an international journal on programmed cell death · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. MRI-based habitat imaging predicts high-risk molecular subtypes and early risk assessment of lower-grade gliomas.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. V-ATPase in glioma stem cells: a novel metabolic vulnerability.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amit AgarwalFrom the Department of Radiology (A.A., A.D., V.G., N.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida Agarwal.amit@mayo.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9139-8007
Mark A EdgarDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology (Neuropathology) (M.A.E.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.
Amit DesaiFrom the Department of Radiology (A.A., A.D., V.G., N.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-3073-6823
Vivek GuptaFrom the Department of Radiology (A.A., A.D., V.G., N.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0002-4298-7179
Neetu SoniFrom the Department of Radiology (A.A., A.D., V.G., N.S.), Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.ORCID 0000-0003-2082-1634
Girish BathlaDepartment of Radiology (G.B.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0003-3170-242X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Given the recent advances in molecular pathogenesis of tumors, with better correlation with tumor behavior and prognosis, major changes were made to the new 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of CNS tumors, including updated criteria for diagnosis of glioblastoma (GBM). Diagnosis of GBM now requires absence of isocitrate dehydrogenase and histone 3 mutations (IDH-wild-type and H3-wild-type) as the basic cornerstone, with elimination of the IDH-mutant category. The requirements for diagnosis were conventionally histopathological, based on the presence of pathognomonic features such as microvascular proliferation and necrosis. However, even if these histologic features are absent, many lower-grade (WHO grade 2/3) diffuse astrocytic gliomas behave clinically similar to GBM (grade 4). The 2021 WHO classification introduced new molecular criteria that can be used to upgrade the diagnosis of such histologically lower-grade, IDH-wild-type, astrocytomas to GBM. The 3 molecular criteria include: concurrent gain of whole chromosome 7 and loss of whole chromosome 10 (+7/-10); telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter mutation; and epidermal growth factor receptor amplification. Given these changes, it is now strongly recommended to have molecular analysis of WHO grade 2/3 diffuse astrocytic, IDH-wild-type, gliomas in adult patients, as identification of any of the above mutations allows for upgrading the tumor to WHO grade 4 ("molecular GBM") with important prognostic implications. Despite an early stage, there is active ongoing research on the unique MR imaging features of molecular GBM. This paper highlights the differences between "molecular" and "histopathological" GBM, with the aim of providing a basic understanding about these changes.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaWorld Health OrganizationHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMutationNeoplasm GradingIsocitrate Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID38438167
PMCPMC11383408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.