Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438134›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical research2024

The relationship between compartment models and their stochastic counterparts: A comparative study with examples of the COVID-19 epidemic modeling.

Ziyu Zhao, Yi Zhou, Jinxing Guan, Yan Yan, Jing Zhao, Zhihang Peng, Feng Chen, Yang Zhao, Fang Shao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ziyu ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, China.
Yi ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, China.
Jinxing GuanDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, China.
Yan YanNanjing Hanwei Public Health Research Institute Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210005, China.
Jing ZhaoNanjing Hanwei Public Health Research Institute Co., Ltd, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210005, China.
Zhihang PengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, China.
Feng ChenDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, China.
Yang ZhaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, China.
Fang ShaoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211166, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deterministic compartment models (CMs) and stochastic models, including stochastic CMs and agent-based models, are widely utilized in epidemic modeling. However, the relationship between CMs and their corresponding stochastic models is not well understood. The present study aimed to address this gap by conducting a comparative study using the susceptible, exposed, infectious, and recovered (SEIR) model and its extended CMs from the coronavirus disease 2019 modeling literature. We demonstrated the equivalence of the numerical solution of CMs using the Euler scheme and their stochastic counterparts through theoretical analysis and simulations. Based on this equivalence, we proposed an efficient model calibration method that could replicate the exact solution of CMs in the corresponding stochastic models through parameter adjustment. The advancement in calibration techniques enhanced the accuracy of stochastic modeling in capturing the dynamics of epidemics. However, it should be noted that discrete-time stochastic models cannot perfectly reproduce the exact solution of continuous-time CMs. Additionally, we proposed a new stochastic compartment and agent mixed model as an alternative to agent-based models for large-scale population simulations with a limited number of agents. This model offered a balance between computational efficiency and accuracy. The results of this research contributed to the comparison and unification of deterministic CMs and stochastic models in epidemic modeling. Furthermore, the results had implications for the development of hybrid models that integrated the strengths of both frameworks. Overall, the present study has provided valuable epidemic modeling techniques and their practical applications for understanding and controlling the spread of infectious diseases.

Indexed as

agent-based modelscomparative studycompartment-agent mixed modelscompartment modelsCOVID-19

Identifiers

PMID38438134
PMCPMC11001592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.