Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38438116›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2024

Admission avoidance hospital at home.

Kate Edgar, Steve Iliffe, Helen A Doll, Mike J Clarke, Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley, Eric Wong, Sasha Shepperd

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07166653 (Nordic Digital Health Education as an Implementation Tool for Hospital-at-home - Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07166653 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Nordic Digital Health Education as an Implementation Tool for Hospital-at-home - Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorNordsjaellands HospitalRan2025 to 2026Enrolled14ConditionsHospitalArmsHaH education
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Patients' experiences of receiving hospital care from a mobile care unit - a qualitative interview study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Caregiver Burden at the Onset of Acute Hospital-At-Home.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026
    Observational
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Kate EdgarMedical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Steve IliffeResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Helen A DollClinical Outcomes Assessments, ICON Commercialisation and Outcomes, Dublin, Ireland.
Mike J ClarkeCentre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Daniela C Gonçalves-BradleyCINTESIS - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Porto, Portugal.
Eric WongSt. Michael's Hospital and Unity Health Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Sasha ShepperdNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Centre for Health Technology and Services Research · PTLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBQueen's University Belfast · GBSt. Michael's Hospital · CAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdmission avoidance hospital at home provides active treatment by healthcare professionals in the patient's home for a condition that would otherwise require acute hospital inpatient care, and always for a limited time period. This is the fourth update of this review.

objectivesTo determine the effectiveness and cost of managing patients with admission avoidance hospital at home compared with inpatient hospital care. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL on 24 February 2022, and checked the reference lists of eligible articles. We sought ongoing and unpublished studies by searching ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO ICTRP, and by contacting providers and researchers involved in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials recruiting participants aged 18 years and over. Studies comparing admission avoidance hospital at home with acute hospital inpatient care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We followed the standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane and the Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) Group. We performed meta-analysis for trials that compared similar interventions, reported comparable outcomes with sufficient data, and used individual patient data when available. We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the body of evidence for the most important outcomes. MAIN

resultsWe included 20 randomised controlled trials with a total of 3100 participants; four trials recruited participants with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; two trials recruited participants recovering from a stroke; seven trials recruited participants with an acute medical condition who were mainly older; and the remaining trials recruited participants with a mix of conditions. We assessed the majority of the included studies as at low risk of selection, detection, and attrition bias, and unclear for selective reporting and performance bias. For an older population, admission avoidance hospital at home probably makes little or no difference on mortality at six months' follow-up (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68 to 1.13; P = 0.30; I AUTHORS'

conclusionsAdmission avoidance hospital at home, with the option of transfer to hospital, may provide an effective alternative to inpatient care for a select group of older people who have been referred for hospital admission. The intervention probably makes little or no difference to patient health outcomes; may improve satisfaction; probably reduces the likelihood of relocating to residential care; and probably decreases costs.

Indexed as

Home Care ServicesHospitalizationHospitalsHealth FacilitiesHumansInpatientsPatient Discharge

Identifiers

PMID38438116
PMCPMC10911897
OpenAlexW4392571302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.