Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38437677›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024

Management of shunt dysfunction using noninvasive intracranial pressure waveform monitoring: illustrative case.

Raphael Bertani, Caio Perret, Stefan Koester, Paulo Santa Maria, Savio Batista, Sophia de Andrade Cavicchioli, Sany Tomomi de Almeida Rocha Arita, Ruy Monteiro, Gianne Lucchesi, Fernando Augusto Vasconcellos and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Raphael Bertani1Department of Neurosurgery, Cerebral Hydrodynamics Group, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Caio Perret2Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Stefan Koester3School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee.
Paulo Santa Maria2Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Savio Batista4Medical School, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Sophia de Andrade Cavicchioli5Medical School, Universidade de Araraquara, Araraquara, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sany Tomomi de Almeida Rocha Arita6Medical School, Faculdade Santa Marcelina, São Paulo, Brazil; and.
Ruy Monteiro2Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Gianne Lucchesi2Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fernando Augusto Vasconcellos2Department of Neurosurgery, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Matheus Miranda1Department of Neurosurgery, Cerebral Hydrodynamics Group, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Wellingson Silva Paiva7Department of Neurosurgery, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fernando Gomes Pinto1Department of Neurosurgery, Cerebral Hydrodynamics Group, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital Geral de Bonsucesso · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRCentro Universitário de Araraquara · BRFaculdade Santa Marcelina · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro · BRVanderbilt University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNormal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) treatment consists of using valves for drainage, as it is for hydrocephalus in general. Despite this, complications can occur, putting the patient at risk, and neurological monitoring is crucial. OBSERVATIONS: A 61-year-old male, who had been diagnosed with NPH 3 years prior and was being treated with a ventriculoperitoneal shunt with a programmable valve, presented to the emergency department because of a traumatic brain injury due to a fall from standing height. No previous complications were reported. He had an altered intracranial pressure (ICP) waveform in the emergency room when monitored with the brain4care device, with a P2/P1 ratio of 1.6. Imaging helped to confirm shunt dysfunction. Revision surgery normalized the ratio to 1.0, and the patient was discharged. Upon return after 14 days, an outpatient analysis revealed a ratio of 0.6, indicating improvement. LESSONS: In selected cases of NPH, noninvasive ICP waveform morphology analysis can be effective as a diagnostic aid, as well as in the pre- and postsurgical follow-up, given the possibility of comparing the values of ICP preoperatively and immediately postoperatively and the outpatient P2/P1 ratio, helping to manage these patients.

Indexed as

intracranial pressureneuroprotectionnormal pressure hydrocephalusventriculoperitoneal shunt

Identifiers

PMID38437677
PMCPMC10916843
OpenAlexW4392368997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.