Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38437644›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of botany2025

Fire effects on pollination and plant reproduction: a quantitative review.

Lucas M Carbone, Julia Tavella, Victoria Marquez, Lorena Ashworth, Juli G Pausas, Ramiro Aguilar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of botany, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
27.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Pollination and plant reproduction in the Cerrado, the world's most biodiverse savanna.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The influence of changing fire regimes on specialized plant-animal interactions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Lucas M CarboneInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299. CC 495, CP 5000. Córdoba, Argentina.
Julia TavellaInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299. CC 495, CP 5000. Córdoba, Argentina.
Victoria MarquezInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299. CC 495, CP 5000. Córdoba, Argentina.
Lorena AshworthInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299. CC 495, CP 5000. Córdoba, Argentina.
Juli G PausasCentro de Investigaciones sobre Desertificación (CIDE-CSIC), Ctra. CV-315, Km 10.7, 46113 Moncada, Valencia, Spain.
Ramiro AguilarInstituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, CONICET. Av. Vélez Sarsfield 299. CC 495, CP 5000. Córdoba, Argentina.
Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Vegetal · ARConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARCentre d'Investigacions sobre Desertificació · ES

Funding

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas PIP-11220200101260CODISTEPIC project PID2022-141530NB-C21National Agency for Scientific and Technological Promotion PICT-2019-1536
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsFire may favour plant flowering by opening up the vegetation and increasing abiotic resource availability. Increased floral display size can attract more pollinators and increase absolute fruit and seed production immediately after a fire. However, anthropogenic increases in fire frequency may alter these responses. We aim to assess the effects of fire on the pollination and reproductive success of plants at the global scale.

methodsWe performed a systematic literature review and meta-analyses to examine overall fire effects as well as different fire parameters on pollination and on plant reproduction. We also explored to what extent the responses vary among pollinators, pollination vectors, plant regeneration strategies, compatibility systems, vegetation types and biomes. KEY

resultsMost studies were conducted in fire-prone ecosystems. Overall, single fires increased pollination and plant reproduction but this effect was overridden by recurrent fires. Floral visitation rates of pollinators were enhanced immediately following a wildfire, and especially in bee-pollinated plants. Fire increased the absolute production of fruits or seeds but not fruit or seed set. The reproductive benefits were mostly observed in wind-pollinated (graminoids), herbaceous and resprouter species. Finally, fire effects on pollination were positively correlated with fire effects on plant reproductive success.

conclusionsFire has a central role in pollination and plant sexual reproduction in fire-prone ecosystems. The increase in the absolute production of fruits and seeds suggests that fire benefits to plant reproduction are probably driven by increased abiotic resources and the consequent floral display size. However, reproduction efficiency, as measured by fruit or seed set, does not increase with fire. In contrast, when assessed on the same plant simultaneously, fire effects on pollination are translated into reproduction. Increased fire frequency due to anthropogenic changes can alter the nature of the response to fire.

Indexed as

FiresPlant Physiological PhenomenaPollinationEcosystemFlowersFruitReproductionSeedsAngiospermsanthropic changes in fire regimefire ecologyflowering plantsmeta-analysisplant fitnessplant–pollinator interactionplant sexual reproductionreproductive success

Identifiers

PMID38437644
PMCPMC11805929
OpenAlexW4392477522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.