ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2024
Next-Generation Screening for Colorectal Cancer, an Incremental Approach to a Global Disease.
Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A risk assessment model for colon cancer and precancerous lesions based on cancer screening and external validation of the NHANES database.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
New screening tests for early detection of colorectal cancer and its precursors are rapidly emerging with the focus on noninvasive tests which can be used in both structured opportunistic and population-based organized screening programs. Novel technologies are identifying new combinations of promising markers. Conducting large prospective clinical trials of efficacy requires very large numbers of subjects constituting intended-use populations. These trials are often preceded by studies using smaller numbers of "convenience" samples to derive panels of relevant markers and algorithms to combine them and define what constitutes a positive test. The article by Gagrat and colleagues in this issue reports results from one such study designed to yield a "next-generation" multitargeted (mt-sDNA) stool test. This report exemplifies the advantages and limitations of this approach. See related article by Gagrat et al., p. 119.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38437584What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.