Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38437237›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2024

Comparative evaluation of lateral flow assays to diagnose chronic Trypanosoma cruzi infection in Bolivia.

Ronald López, Andrea García, José Jorge Chura Aruni, Victor Balboa, Andrea Rodríguez, Berra Erkosar, Aurélie Kamoun, Marcelo Rodriguez, Evelin Fortun, Laura C Bohorquez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ronald LópezInstituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Andrea GarcíaInstituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia.
José Jorge Chura AruniInstituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Victor BalboaInstituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Andrea RodríguezInstituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Berra ErkosarFIND, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, Geneva, Switzerland.
Aurélie KamounFIND, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, Geneva, Switzerland.
Marcelo RodriguezFIND, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, Geneva, Switzerland.
Evelin FortunInstituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia.
Laura C BohorquezFIND, Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6698-395X
FIND · CH

Funding

Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics - FIND (Geneva, Switzerland)Laboratory of Entomology and Parasitology, Instituto Nacional de Laboratorios de Salud (INLASA), La Paz, Bolivia
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bolivia has the highest incidence of Chagas disease (CD) worldwide. Caused by the parasite Trypanasoma cruzi, CD is generally a chronic condition. Diagnosis is logistically and financially challenging, requiring at least two different laboratory-based serological tests. Many CD cases are missed; in Bolivia it is estimated just 6% of individuals chronically infected with T. cruzi get diagnosed. Achieving control on the way to elimination of CD requires a radical simplification of the current CD testing pathways, to overcome the barriers to accessing CD treatment. We aimed to generate unbiased performance data of lateral flow assays (LFAs) for T. cruzi infection in Bolivia, to evaluate their usefulness for improving T. cruzi diagnosis rates in a precise and efficient manner. This retrospective, laboratory-based, diagnostic evaluation study sought to estimate the sensitivity/specificity of 10 commercially available LFAs for T. cruzi, using the current CD diagnostic algorithm employed in Bolivia as the reference test method. All tests were blinded at the study site and performed by three operators. In total, 470 serum samples were tested, including 221 and 249 characterized as CD-positive/-negative, respectively. The LFAs were scored according to their relative importance using a decision-tree-based algorithm, with the mean decrease in Gini index as the scoring metric. The estimates of sensitivities ranged from 62.2-97.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) lower bound 55.0-94.7%); for specificities the range was 78.6-100% (95% CI lower bound 72.0-97.5%); 5/10 and 6/10 tests had sensitivity >90% and specificity >95%, respectively. Four LFAs showed high values of both sensitivity (93-95%) and specificity (97-99%). The agreement between 6 LFAs and the reference tests was almost perfect (Kappa 0.83-0.94). Most LFAs evaluated thus showed performances comparable with current laboratory-based diagnostic methods.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseaseTrypanosoma cruziBoliviaHumansRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and Specificity

Identifiers

PMID38437237
PMCPMC10939271
OpenAlexW4392367569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.