Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38437223›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Inverting the deficit model in global mental health: An examination of strengths and assets of community mental health care in Ghana, India, Occupied Palestinian territories, and South Africa.

Kaaren Mathias, Noah Bunkley, Pooja Pillai, Kenneth A Ae-Ngibise, Lily Kpobi, Dan Taylor, Kaustubh Joag, Meenal Rawat, Weeam Hammoudeh, Suzan Mitwalli and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
15.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 6 countries.

Kaaren MathiasFaculty of Health, University of Canterbury New Zealand, Christchurch New Zealand and Burans, Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Emmanuel Hospital Association, New Delhi, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9607-9459
Noah BunkleyFaculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3995-8983
Pooja PillaiBurans, Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Emmanuel Hospital Association, New Delhi, India.
Kenneth A Ae-NgibiseKintampo Health Research Centre, Kintampo, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5638-4814
Lily KpobiRegional Institute for Population Studies, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7074-5804
Dan TaylorExecutive Secretary, Mind Freedom, Accra, Ghana.
Kaustubh JoagCentre for Mental Health Law and Policy, Indian Law Society, Pune, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3683-1159
Meenal RawatBurans, Herbertpur Christian Hospital, Emmanuel Hospital Association, New Delhi, India.
Weeam HammoudehInstitute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian Territories.
Suzan MitwalliInstitute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, West Bank, Occupied Palestinian Territories.
Ashraf KageeStellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1241-2566
Andre van RensburgCentre for Rural Health, University of Kwazulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Dörte BemmeCentre of Society and Mental health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Rochelle A BurgessInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9749-7065
Sumeet JainSchool of Political and Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7613-6284
Hanna KienzlerDepartment of Global Health and Social Medicine and Centre for Society and Mental Health, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ursula M ReadWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9482-7898
Birzeit University · PSEmmanuel Hospital Association · INKing's College London · GBIndian Law Institute · INKintampo Health Research Centre · GHStellenbosch University · ZAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Auckland · NZUniversity of Canterbury · NZUniversity of Edinburgh · GBUniversity of Ghana · GHUniversity of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global mental health [GMH] scholarship and practice has typically focused on the unmet needs and barriers to mental health in communities, developing biomedical and psychosocial interventions for integration into formal health care platforms in response. In this article, we analyse four diverse settings to disrupt the emphasises on health system weaknesses, treatment gaps and barriers which can perpetuate harmful hierarchies and colonial and medical assumptions, or a 'deficit model'. We draw on the experiential knowledge of community mental health practitioners and researchers working in Ghana, India, the Occupied Palestinian Territory and South Africa to describe key assets existing in 'informal' community mental health care systems and how these are shaped by socio-political contexts. These qualitative case studies emerged from an online mutual learning process convened between 39 academic and community-based collaborators working in 24 countries who interrogated key tenets to inform a social paradigm for global mental health. Bringing together diverse expertise gained from professional practice and research, our sub-group explored the role of Community Mental Health Systems in GMH through comparative country case studies describing the features of community care beyond the health and social care system. We found that the socio-political health determinants of global economic structures in all four countries exert significant influence on local community health systems. We identified that key assets across sites included: family and community care, and support from non-profit organisations and religious and faith-based organisations. Strengthening community assets may promote reciprocal relationships between the formal and informal sectors, providing resources for support and training for communities while communities collaborate in the design and delivery of interventions rooted in localised expertise. This paper highlights the value of informal care, the unique social structures of each local context, and resources within local communities as key existing assets for mental health.

Identifiers

PMID38437223
PMCPMC10911620
OpenAlexW4392367977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.