Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38437217›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2024

Effectiveness of a multi-country implementation-focused network on quality of care: Delivery of interventions and processes for improved maternal, newborn and child health outcomes.

Nehla Djellouli, Yusra Ribhi Shawar, Kasonde Mwaba, Kohenour Akter, Gloria Seruwagi, Asebe Amenu Tufa, Geremew Gonfa, Kondwani Mwandira, QCN Evaluation Group, Agnes Kyamulabi and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Nehla DjellouliInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4200-2314
Yusra Ribhi ShawarBloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Kasonde MwabaInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9972-8664
Kohenour AkterPerinatal Care Project, Diabetic Association of Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0409-1099
Gloria SeruwagiSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Asebe Amenu TufaEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Geremew GonfaEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Kondwani MwandiraParent and Child Health Initiative PACHI, Lilongwe, Malawi.
QCN Evaluation Group
Agnes KyamulabiSchool of Public Health, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5865-3798
Jeremy ShiffmanBloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Mike EnglishCentre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7427-0826
Tim ColbournInstitute for Global Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6917-6552

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Network for Improving Quality of Care for Maternal, Newborn and Child Health (QCN) aims to work through learning, action, leadership and accountability. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of QCN in these four areas at the global level and in four QCN countries: Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda. This mixed method evaluation comprised 2-4 iterative rounds of data collection between 2019-2022, involving stakeholder interviews, hospital observations, QCN members survey, and document review. Qualitative data was analysed using a coding framework developed from underlying theories on network effectiveness, behaviour change, and QCN proposed theory of change. Survey data capturing respondents' perception of QCN was analysed with descriptive statistics. The QCN global level, led by the WHO secretariat, was effective in bringing together network countries' governments and global actors via providing online and in-person platforms for communication and learning. In-country, various interventions were delivered in 'learning districts', however often separately by different partners in different locations, and pandemic-disrupted. Governance structures for quality of care were set-up, some preceding QCN, and were found to be stronger and better (though often externally) resourced at national than local levels. Awareness of operational plans and network activities differed between countries, was lower at local than national levels, but increased from 2019 to 2022. Engagement with, and value of, QCN was perceived to be higher in Uganda and Bangladesh than in Malawi or Ethiopia. Capacity building efforts were implemented in all countries-yet often dependent on implementing partners and donors. QCN stakeholders agreed 15 core monitoring indicators though data collection was challenging, especially for indicators requiring new or parallel systems. Accountability initiatives remained nascent in 2022. Global and national leadership elements of QCN have been most effective to date, with action, learning and accountability more challenging, partner or donor dependent, remaining to be scaled-up, and pandemic-disrupted.

Identifiers

PMID38437217
PMCPMC10911613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.