Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38437191›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2024

Comparison of Modified Shock Index and Shock Index for Predicting Massive Transfusion in Women with Primary Postpartum Hemorrhage: A Retrospective Study.

Hyojeong Kwon, Chang Hwan Sohn, Sang-Min Kim, Youn-Jung Kim, Seung Mok Ryoo, Shin Ahn, Dong-Woo Seo, Won Young Kim

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hyojeong KwonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Chang Hwan SohnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Sang-Min KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Youn-Jung KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Seung Mok RyooDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Shin AhnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Dong-Woo SeoDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
Won Young KimDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
University of Ulsan · KRAsan Medical Center · KRUlsan College · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND The modified shock index (MSI) is calculated as the ratio of heart rate (HR) to mean arterial pressure (MAP) and has been used to predict the need for massive transfusion (MT) in trauma patients. This retrospective study from a single center aimed to compare the MSI with the traditional shock index (SI) to predict the need for MT in 612 women diagnosed with primary postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) at the Emergency Department (ED) between January 2004 and August 2023. MATERIAL AND METHODS The patients were divided into the MT group and the non-MT group. The predictive power of MSI and SI was compared using the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value were calculated. RESULTS Out of 612 patients, 105 (17.2%) required MT. The MT group had higher median values than the non-MT group for MSI (1.58 vs 1.07, P<0.001) and SI (1.22 vs 0.80, P<0.001). The AUC for MSI, with a value of 0.811 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.778-0.841), did not demonstrate a significant difference compared to the AUC for SI, which was 0.829 (95% CI, 0.797-0.858) (P=0.066). The optimal cutoff values for MSI and SI were 1.34 and 1.07, respectively. The specificity and PPV for MT were 77.1% and 40.2% for MSI, and 83.2% and 45.9% for SI. CONCLUSIONS Both MSI and SI were effective in predicting MT in patients with primary PPH. However, MSI did not demonstrate superior performance to SI.

Indexed as

Postpartum HemorrhageBlood TransfusionEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHeart RateHumansPregnancyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID38437191
PMCPMC10921966
OpenAlexW4391101538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.