Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38437154›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of phytoremediation2024

Inventing hyperaccumulator plants: improving practice in phytoextraction research and terminology.

Antony van der Ent, Elizabeth L Rylott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of phytoremediation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nickel Toxicity in Plants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Tolerance and remediation potential of aquatic plants for copper, nickel, lead and zinc in heavy metal-contaminated waters.Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Antony van der EntLaboratory of Genetics, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Elizabeth L RylottCentre for Novel Agricultural Products, Department of Biology, University of York, York, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Toxic metals and metalloids, especially from anthropogenic sources, now pollute substantial areas of our planet. Phytoextraction is a proven technology with the potential to reduce metal/metalloid pollution, and where financially viable, recover valuable metals ('phytomining'). Toward these aims, there has been a surge of publications over the last two decades. While important progress is being made, ongoing propagation of poor practice, and the resultant drain from funding sources, is hindering this promising research area. This includes mis-ascribing hyperaccumulator species, hydroponics with extremely high dose levels, misuse of Bioconcentration Factors, use of food or biomass crops with low accumulation for phytoextraction, the phenomenon of 'template papers' in which a known hyperaccumulator for element

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalMetalsPlantsSoil PollutantsTerminology as TopicMetalsSoil PollutantsBioconcentration factorhydroponicshyperaccumulator

Identifiers

PMID38437154
PMCPMC11221517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.